Democratic Deliberation in the Modern World

Regular price €51.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
automatic-update
B01=Paul Gunn
Cass R. Sunstein
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=JP
Category=JPHV
Cervical Cancer
Colorado Springs
COP=United Kingdom
David Schkade
Deliberating Groups
Deliberative Assemblies
Deliberative Democracy
Deliberative Democratic Ideals
Deliberative Democratic Theory
Deliberative Democrats
Deliberative Ideal
Deliberative Opinion Poll
Delivery_Pre-order
Democratic Appointees
epistemic conditions politics
Epistemic Norms
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Folk Epistemology
Geoffrey M. Vaughan
Good Life
Grand Assumption
Ideological Amplification
Ilya Somin
inclusive decision making processes
Language_English
Manfred Prisching
Mark Pennington
Open Society Institutions
PA=Not yet available
partisan democracy
Policy Issues
political epistemology
Political Ignorance
political polarisation effects
Political Rationality
Political Realism
Preference Falsification
Price_€20 to €50
PS=Active
Public Ignorance
public reasoning analysis
rational discourse theory
Rational Ignorance
Rational Irrationality
Reid Hastie
Robert B. Talisse
Russell Muirhead
Single Member Districts
Sociotropic Evaluation
softlaunch
Young Man

Product details

  • ISBN 9781032927176
  • Weight: 400g
  • Dimensions: 138 x 216mm
  • Publication Date: 14 Oct 2024
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Would ordinary citizens benefit if public decisions were increasingly based on an inclusive and fair exchange of reasons rather than mere voting or choices in the market? Debates amongst deliberative democrats often proceed as though this process of public reasoning is precisely what the democratic ideals of freedom and equality require. Less attention has been paid to whether an inclusive and fair exchange of reasons is possible in any realistic modern setting, and what the effects would be of trying to move democratic institutions in a deliberative direction. To examine these effects, the contributors to this collection of essays bring together a number of analyses of the practical implications of expanding deliberative processes. Some consider the prevailing epistemic conditions in modern societies and their likely effects on deliberative reasoning. Others discuss the politics of these societies, and especially the likely effects of existing political divisions on democratic deliberation. Lastly, the question of what we might hope to see – and what we might hope to avoid – from political argument is addressed. Considered together, these three foci should equip readers to decide whether deliberative democracy is feasible and, if so, if it is desirable.

This book was published as a special issue of Critical Review.

Paul Gunn is lecturer in political economy at Goldsmiths, University of London. He holds a PhD from Queen Mary, University of London, and his research interests concern the implications of social complexity on institutional choice and performance.