Desert Collapses

Regular price €179.80
A01=Stephen Kershnar
advanced moral philosophy research
animal ethics
Author_Stephen Kershnar
Basic Moral Responsibility
blameworthiness
Category=QD
Category=QDTQ
Category=QDTS
circularity
Comparative Desert
compensation
contribution
desert
Desert Literature
distributive justice
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
ethical theory
Forfeiture Theory
General Desert
Geometric Graph
Good Life
Ground Desert
ground of desert
Honey Badgers
moral responsibility
Negative Desert
Objective List Theories
Person's Desert
Person’s Desert
philosophical skepticism
Positive Desert
praiseworthiness
Praiseworthy Act
punishment
Rational Ranking
retributive punishment
Saltwater Crocodile
Self-forming Act
Sentencing Guidelines
Specific Desert
Stephen Kershnar
Utility Monster
Vice Versa
Viciously Circular
Violate
virtue
virtue ethics
Wang Lung

Product details

  • ISBN 9780367756925
  • Weight: 453g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 19 Aug 2021
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days

Our Delivery Time Frames Explained
2-4 Working Days: Available in-stock

10-20 Working Days: On Backorder

Will Deliver When Available: On Pre-Order or Reprinting

We ship your order once all items have arrived at our warehouse and are processed. Need those 2-4 day shipping items sooner? Just place a separate order for them!

People consider desert part of our moral world. It structures how we think about important areas such as love, punishment, and work. This book argues that no one deserves anything. If this is correct, then claims that people deserve general and specific things are false.

At the heart of desert is the notion of moral credit or discredit. People deserve good things (credit) when they are good people or do desirable things. These desirable things might be right, good, or virtuous acts. People deserve bad things (discredit) when they are bad people or do undesirable things. On some theories, people deserve credit in general terms. For instance, they deserve a good life. On other theories, people deserve credit in specific terms. For instance, they deserve specific incomes, jobs, punishments, relationships, or reputations. The author’s argument against desert rests on three claims:

  1. There is no adequate theory of what desert is.
  2. Even if there were an adequate theory of what desert is, nothing grounds (justifies) desert.
  3. Even if there were an adequate theory of what desert is and something were to ground it, there is no plausible account of what people deserve.

Desert Collapses will be of interest to researchers and advanced students working in ethics and political philosophy.

Stephen Kershnar is a distinguished teaching professor in the philosophy department at the State University of New York at Fredonia and an attorney. He focuses on applied ethics and political philosophy. Kershnar has written roughly one hundred articles and book chapters on such diverse topics as abortion, adult-child sex, affirmative action, capitalism, discrimination, equal opportunity, hell, most valuable player, pleasure, pornography, punishment, reparations for slavery, sexual fantasies, slavery, and torture. He is the author of nine books, including Total Collapse: The Case Against Morality and Responsibility (2018), Does the Pro-Life Worldview Make Sense? Abortion, Hell, and Shooting Abortion-Doctors (Routledge, 2017), and Adult-Child Sex: A Philosophical Defense (2015).