Differentiation and Politicization

Regular price €97.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Eleftheria Markozani
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Author_Eleftheria Markozani
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=JBFH
Category=JFFN
Category=JP
Category=JPQB
Category=JPS
COP=United States
Core State Powers
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
Differentiated Integration
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
EU Asylum Policy
EU Migration Policy
Euroscepticism
Flexibility
Language_English
PA=Available
Politicization
Price_€50 to €100
PS=Active
softlaunch

Product details

  • ISBN 9781666909227
  • Weight: 526g
  • Dimensions: 157 x 236mm
  • Publication Date: 20 Mar 2024
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
Differentiation and Politicization: The Case of EU Migration Policy examines the implementation of differentiated integration in EU migration and asylum policy. The research seeks to expand and deepen on the conceptual and factual interaction among core state powers, politicization, the rise of Euroscepticism, the public constraining dissent and the application of different forms of polarity within EU legal framework. Eleftheria Markozani argues that growing Euroscepticism may not only generate the application of opt-outs of particular member states, as previous research has also shown. Instead, she supports that the coincidental increase of politicization of a policy field and Euroscepticism in many member states can provoke the introduction of other forms of polarity, such as flexibility, in EU legal rules. The study begins with the cases of UK and Denmark, outlining the way that the mobilization of exclusive national identities raises the demand for differentiation. However, it , continues with the introduction of flexibility in the Commission’s proposals on the 2020 New Pact on Migration, through the lens of the aggregated level of politicization and the rise of right-wing Eurosceptic parties in many states of EU. While the treaty opt-outs have been related with Euroscepticism since the Maastricht Treaty through the polarization provoked by referendums and elections, the 2015 refugee crisis resulted in the EU institutions’ endorsement of flexibility within the Dublin system, a secondary legal rule.
Eleftheria Markozani works in the Department of International and European Affairs of the Ministry of Migration and Asylum of Greece.

More from this author