Disability in Medieval Christian Philosophy and Theology

Regular price €56.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
ableism
afterlife
Albert the Great
Amerindian Peoples
analytic philosophy
anti-ableism arguments
Aquinas
Aquinas's Account
Aquinas's Understanding
Aquinas's View
Aquinas’s Account
Aquinas’s Understanding
Aquinas’s View
barbarians
Bartolome de las Casas
Beatific Vision
Boethius
Byzantine Account
Category=JBFM
Category=JHB
Category=N
Category=QDHF
Category=QRAB
Category=QRAX
Category=QRM
Common Language
Congenital Disabilities
congenital disability
deafness
dignity
disability
Disabled Human Beings
disembodied souls
Duns Scotus
Elizabeth Barnes
embodiment
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Equal Moral Status
Francisco De Vitoria
Gloria Frost
heaven
hell
Highest Human Good
hylomorphism
Imago Dei
imago Dei interpretation
Imago Dei Trinitatis
Imago Trinitatis
intellectual disability
Intrinsic Moral Status
Jenni Kuuliala
John Locke
John Slotemaker
Kevin Timpe
Latin philosophy
Latin theology
Mark K. Spencer
martyrs
Mary Anne Warren
Medieval Accounts
Medieval Aristotelians
medieval perspectives on disability and well-being
medieval philosophy
medieval theology
mental disability
Miguel Romero
Moral Aptitude
mystics
natural slavery
personhood
personhood theory
Peter Lombard
Reima Valimaki
resurrection
Richard Cross
Scott M. Williams
Separated Soul
Severe Cognitive Impairments
Spanish Colonial Enterprise
Thomas Aquinas
Thomas M. Ward
wild men
Young Man

Product details

  • ISBN 9781032337005
  • Weight: 499g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 13 Jun 2022
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This book uses the tools of analytic philosophy and close readings of medieval Christian philosophical and theological texts in order to survey what these thinkers said about what today we call ‘disability.’ The chapters also compare what these medieval authors say with modern and contemporary philosophers and theologians of disability. This dual approach enriches our understanding of the history of disability in medieval Christian philosophy and theology and opens up new avenues of research for contemporary scholars working on disability.

The volume is divided into three parts. Part One addresses theoretical frameworks regarding disability, particularly on questions about the definition(s) of ‘disability’ and how disability relates to well-being. The chapters are then divided into two further parts in order to reflect ways that medieval philosophers and theologians theorized about disability. Part Two is on disability in this life, and Part Three is on disability in the afterlife. Taken as a whole, these chapters support two general observations. First, these philosophical theologians sometimes resist Greco-Roman ableist views by means of theological and philosophical anti-ableist arguments and counterexamples. Here we find some surprising disability-positive perspectives that are built into different accounts of a happy human life. We also find equal dignity of all human beings no matter ability or disability. Second, some of the seeds for modern and contemporary ableist views were developed in medieval Christian philosophy and theology, especially with regard to personhood and rationality, an intellectualist interpretation of the imago Dei, and the identification of human dignity with the use of reason.

This volume surveys disability across a wide range of medieval Christian writers from the time of Augustine up to Francisco Suarez. It will be of interest to scholars and graduate students working in medieval philosophy and theology, or disability studies.

Scott M. Williams is an Assistant Professor of philosophy at the University of North Carolina Asheville. He publishes in the areas of medieval theology and philosophy, philosophy of religion, and philosophy of disability. He has published several articles in philosophical theology on the Trinity, and recently published a response article, in Faith and Philosophy, called "In Defense of a Latin Social Trinity: A Response to William Hasker." He is currently writing a book, Henry of Ghent on the Trinity, and is co-editing a forthcoming special issue of the journal TheoLogica on conciliar trinitarianism