Dissents, Contradictions, and Ambiguities of the Soviet Unofficial Literature

Regular price €102.99
Title
Quantity:
Will Deliver When Available
Will Deliver When Available
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Konstantin Chadov
Author_Konstantin Chadov
Category=DS
culturological
Czechoslovakia
eq_bestseller
eq_biography-true-stories
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
forthcoming
Poland
sociological intuitions
Soviet cultural policy
structural psychoanalysis
Ukraine

Product details

  • ISBN 9781666979886
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 01 Oct 2026
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

The book discusses the internal structure of the Soviet unofficial literary community of Leningrad in the 1970s and 1980s. Drawing on the concepts of Jacques Lacan, Alain Badiou, and Jacques Derrida, it describes the factors that contributed to the "loosening" of the community's stability – a task that requires tracing various forms of omission, contradiction, and ambiguity that constituted the community's life.

Dissents, Contradictions, and Ambiguities of the Soviet Unofficial Literature offers a reconsideration of two prevailing views of Soviet unofficial culture: first, that it was a series of friendship circles that turned their "pariah" status within the Soviet literary system into an artistic device; and second, that it was an "alternative social space", a kind of public sphere that fought against Soviet monologism. As the book shows, tensions within the community arose when these two regimes – that of friendly endeavor and that of public activity – were juxtaposed. After certain events in the mid-1970s, the community definitively entered the public sphere, with the obligation to produce "good enough works" (a fact that can be reconstructed with the help of structural psychoanalysis). However, the structure of the community remained rather amorphous, unsuited to such a task: for most, cultural production was still a kind of bohemian entertainment, not something that required collective effort.

Konstantin Chadov is an independent scholar of Soviet literature.

More from this author