Distributing the Harm of Just Wars

Regular price €210.80
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Sara Van Goozen
Afghanistan
Associative Duties
Author_Sara Van Goozen
AWS
Category=JPA
Category=JW
Category=QDTQ
civilian protection
DDE
Defensive Harm
Doctrine Of Double Effect
egalitarian risk distribution in conflict
Enemy Combatants
Enemy Non-combatants
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Fellow Combatants
Foreseen Side Effect
harm
Humanitarian Interventions
Innocent Shield
international humanitarian law
Iraq
Jus Post Bellum
just war
Means Principle
MHR
military ethics research
minimal harm requirement
moral philosophy
NATO Personnel
Necessity Requirement
Non-combatant
proportionality in warfare
Recognition Respect
risk
risk ethics
Side Effect Harm
Strategic Bomber
Supreme Emergency
UN
Unjust Combatants
Unjust Threat

Product details

  • ISBN 9780367435806
  • Weight: 700g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 11 Mar 2021
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This book argues that the risk of harm in armed conflict should be divided equally between combatants and enemy non-combatants.

International law requires that combatants in war take ‘all feasible precautions’ to minimise damage to civilian objects, injury to civilians, and incidental loss of civilian life. However, there is no clear explanation of what ‘feasible precautions’ means in this context, or what would count as sufficiently minimised incidental harm. As a result, it is difficult to judge whether a particular war or offensive actually satisfies this requirement. Just war theorists often consider it common sense that merely not intending to harm innocent civilians is not sufficient, but there is little clarity in the literature regarding what this means. One crucial question that is almost always overlooked is that of what the appropriate baseline distribution of risk should be.

This book defends the Minimal Harm Requirement (MHR), which states that combatants should make an effort to reduce merely foreseen harm to enemy non-combatants to the lowest reasonable level. In order to assess which risk impositions are reasonable, and which are not, an egalitarian baseline should be adopted, suggesting that other things being equal risk of harm should be distributed equally between just combatants and unjust non-combatants.

This book will be of much interest to students of just war theory, ethics, security studies, and international relations.

Sara Van Goozen is Associate Lecturer in Political Philosophy at the University of York, UK.

More from this author