Dividing Discipline

Regular price €112.99
Title
Quantity:
Will Deliver When Available
Will Deliver When Available
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=K.J. Holsti
Author_K.J. Holsti
Category=GTU
Category=JPS
Category=KCP
eq_bestseller
eq_business-finance-law
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
forthcoming
Hegemony
International relations
international theory
Neo-Marxist
pluralism
Political realism

Product details

  • ISBN 9781041382416
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 01 Sep 2026
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Until the early 1970s, the study of international relations was based on an intellectual consensus regarding the essential questions of the field: the causes of war and the conditions of peace. By the late 1970s and early 1980s, however, a number of theoretical projects had begun to argue that both the models and the research and teaching agendas of the past were inappropriate for understanding the contemporary interdependent system of states. They specified the need to develop entirely new visions of the world, and to jettison many of the concepts and approaches of the past—particularly those that went under the name of political “realism”.

By the mid-1980s, teachers and researchers faced a wide array of theoretical perspectives in the field: international political economy, peace studies, dependency theory, world order models, peace research, strategic studies, and the like. The field, once unified in its fundamental assumptions, had become increasingly fragmented.

First published in 1985, The Dividing Discipline delineates the main strands of then-contemporary theoretical work and speculates about the possibilities of reintegrating the field and bringing some order to it. In addition, the book examines the development of the discipline in Australia, Canada, England, India, Japan, Korea, France, and the United States to measure the extent to which there existed a genuine international community of scholars. These chapters reveal such a degree of reliance on theoretical work produced in the United States that the relationship could be described as one of intellectual dependence.

Kal Holsti retired in July 2000 but is now a Research Associate with the Centre for International Relations in the Liu Institute. His specializations include international relations theory, security studies, and foreign policy analysis. He is a former editor of the International Studies Quarterly, co-editor of the Canadian Journal of Political Science, and former President of both the Canadian Political Science Association and the International Studies Association. He has taught as a visiting professor at the University of Hawaii, the International University of Japan, Kyoto University, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and at McGill University.

More from this author