Doing without Free Will

Regular price €102.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A32=Christopher Kluz
A32=J. Thomas Cook
A32=Julia Haas
A32=Matthew Homan
A32=Ursula Goldenbaum
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
akrasia (weakness of the will)
automatic-update
B01=Christopher Kluz
B01=Ursula Goldenbaum
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HPQ
Category=JBFV
Category=JFM
Category=QDTQ
COP=United States
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
determinism
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
ethics
free will
Language_English
meta-ethical relativism versus absolutism
moral philosophy
moral values
PA=Available
Price_€50 to €100
PS=Active
reactive attitudes versus objective attitudes
responsibility
softlaunch
Spinoza

Product details

  • ISBN 9781498523226
  • Weight: 395g
  • Dimensions: 159 x 236mm
  • Publication Date: 08 Oct 2015
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Doing without Free Will: Spinoza and Contemporary Moral Problems introduces Spinoza into the contemporary discussion on free will and on moral problems surrounding this discussion. Traditional Western moral philosophy, for the most part, has been built on the assumption of free will as a special human capacity to freely choose actions without being determined in that choice. This idea draws increasing critique, fueled recently especially by the ever new findings of neuroscience. But how can we develop a moral philosophy without free will?
Spinoza faced a similar challenge when writing his Ethics during the rise of modern science and its deterministic model of nature and, for this reason, has much to offer the current discussion. Not only does he provide a foundation for understanding moral responsibility without free will, he also provides an explanation and solution to the classical problem of akrasia precisely because he argues the will is not free. He worked out an entirely new system of moral philosophy that can help resolve the meta-ethical dilemma between absolutism and relativism, showing how moral values evolve naturally within society.
Despite denying the traditional God-like power of “free will” Spinoza developed a robust concept of freedom, one that is distinctly human and viable today. His modernity comes to light when we look at his answers to the much discussed questions whether it is possible or even desirable to develop objective instead of reactive attitudes toward our fellow human beings. His answers, perhaps surprisingly, resemble positions held by some contemporary philosophers.

Ursula Goldenbaumis associate professor of philosophy at Emory University.

Christopher Kluz is assistant professor in the Institute for Liberal Education at the Catholic University of Daegu, South Korea.