Domestic Politics and International Narcotics Control

Regular price €58.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Victor J. Hinojosa
approval
Approval Ratings
Author_Victor J. Hinojosa
bilateral relations
cali
Cali Cartel
Cali Drug Cartel
cartel
Category=JKVG
Category=JPS
Category=JPV
Certification Decision
Colombian President
comparative politics
Concerted Effort
confidential
Confidential Interview
congressional influence
De Relaciones Exteriores
domestic terrorism impact
drug policy analysis
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Ernesto Samper
executive
Executive Legislative Relations
Foreign Policy Victory
Gaviria Administration
INCSR
International Narcotics Control
interview
legislative
Low Approval Ratings
Narcotics Control
Narcotics Control Policy
PGR
Plan Colombia
policies
President Samper
President Zedillo
presidential reputation
ratings
relations
SRE
Supplemental Appropriations Bill
United States
US drug enforcement policy comparison
Win Set

Product details

  • ISBN 9780415541206
  • Weight: 230g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 04 May 2012
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This book examines different levels of narcotics control cooperation between the United States, Mexico and Colombia.

Victor J. Hinojosa finds that Mexico is consistently held to a very different standard than Colombia and that the US often satisfies domestic political pressures to be tough on drugs by punishing Colombia while allowing Mexico much more freedom to pursue different strategies. He also explores the role of domestic terrorism and presidential reputation in Colombia for the US-Colombia pair and the role of competing issues in the US-Mexican bilateral agenda for that country pair, finding that congressional pressure and electoral tests exert the most impact on US behavior but that Mexican and Colombian behavior is best explained in other ways. Together, these findings suggest both the promise of integrating the study of international relations and comparative politics and important limitations of the theoretical framework.

More from this author