Durkheim, Bernard and Epistemology

Regular price €55.99
A01=Paul Q. Hirst
Agnostic
Author_Paul Q. Hirst
Bernard's Conception
Bernard's Position
bernards
Bernard’s Conception
Bernard’s Position
Category=JHBA
Category=QDTK
collective
conception
consciousness
critique
Durkheim's Attempt
Durkheim's Critique
Durkheim's Epistemology
Durkheim's Position
Durkheim's Project
Durkheim's Sociology
Durkheimian Discourse
durkheims
Durkheim’s Attempt
Durkheim’s Critique
Durkheim’s Epistemology
Durkheim’s Position
Durkheim’s Project
Durkheim’s Sociology
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Experimental Reasoning
facts
Follow
Histological Elements
Histological Units
Human Milieu
Logical Relation
Morphological Order
morphology
Physico Chemical Phenomena
Physiological Phenomena
Rigorous Idealism
Scientific Determinism
Scientific Sociology
Simple Society
social
Social Morphology
sociology
Vitalist Biology

Product details

  • ISBN 9780415847148
  • Weight: 249g
  • Dimensions: 138 x 216mm
  • Publication Date: 01 Mar 2013
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days

Our Delivery Time Frames Explained
2-4 Working Days: Available in-stock

10-20 Working Days: On Backorder

Will Deliver When Available: On Pre-Order or Reprinting

We ship your order once all items have arrived at our warehouse and are processed. Need those 2-4 day shipping items sooner? Just place a separate order for them!

This title, first published in 1975, contains two complimentary studies by Paul Q. Hirst: the first based on Claude Bernard’s theory of scientific knowledge, and the second concerning Emile Durkheim’s attempt to provide a philosophical foundation for a scientific sociology in The Rules of Sociological Method. The author’s primary concern is to answer the question: is Durkheim’s theory of knowledge logically consistent and philosophically viable? His principal conclusion is that the epistemology developed in the Rules is an impossible one and that its inherent contradictions are proof that sociology as it is commonly understood can never be a scientific discipline.