Education and Human Values

Regular price €55.99
A01=Michael Slote
Aristotelian Virtue Ethics
Author_Michael Slote
Better Lives
care
Care Ethics
care ethics pedagogy
Category=JNA
Category=JNAM
Category=QDTQ
character
concern
Creative Achievement
democratic schooling
Dewey's Educational Philosophy
Dewey’s Educational Philosophy
empathic
Empathic Reactions
Empathic Tendencies
empathy based moral instruction
empathy development
epistemic
Epistemic Humility
Epistemic Rationality
Epistemic Virtues
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
ethics
Follow
Held
Ideal Observer Theory
Inductive Discipline
Kantian Liberal
Meth Ods
moral
Moral Education
moral education theory
Moral Motivation
Native Spanish Speakers
nel
Nel Noddings
Nelson Mandela
noddings
Practical Rationality
psychological motivation learning
Purely Intellectual
Sentimentalist Account
sentimentalist philosophy
virtue
Wo

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138938700
  • Weight: 158g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 16 Jul 2015
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days

Our Delivery Time Frames Explained
2-4 Working Days: Available in-stock

10-20 Working Days: On Backorder

Will Deliver When Available: On Pre-Order or Reprinting

We ship your order once all items have arrived at our warehouse and are processed. Need those 2-4 day shipping items sooner? Just place a separate order for them!

Two of our greatest educational theorists, John Dewey and Nel Noddings, have been reluctant to admit that some students are simply more talented than others. This was no doubt due to their feeling that such an admission was inconsistent with democratic concern for everyone. But there really is such a thing as superior talent; and the present book explains how that admission is compatible with our ideals of caring (and democracy). Traditionalists confident that some disciplines are more important than others haven’t worried that that way of putting things threatens to make those who are excluded feel quite bad about themselves. But an ethics of care can show us how to make these differences much less hurtful and more morally acceptable than anything that has been proposed by traditionalists.

So the present book offers a middle way between the denial of the reality of superior talents and an insensitive insistence on that reality. It argues that care ethics gives us a way to do this, and it bases that claim largely on the promise of such an ethics for moral education in schools and in homes. It is argued on psychological grounds that caring can only take place on the basis of empathy for others, and the book shows in great detail how empathy can be encouraged or develop in school and home contexts. Other approaches to moral education—like Kantian cognitive-developmentalism and Aristotelian character education—can’t account for (increasing) moral motivation in the way that an emphasis on the development of empathy allows. And in the end, it is only students educated via care ethics who will be sensitive to one another in a way that largely undercuts the negative psychological impact of educational institutions and practices that acknowledge the greater talents or creativity that some students have.

Michael Slote is the UST Professor of Ethics at the University of Miami. He is a former Tanner Lecturer and a Member of the Royal Irish Academy. He has written many books and articles on ethics and political philosophy, most recently The Impossibility of Perfection: Aristotle, Feminism, and the Complexities of Ethics (Oxford, 2011).