Educational Change Towards Problem Based Learning

Regular price €109.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Huichun Li
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Author_Huichun Li
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=JNF
change management strategies
COP=Denmark
curriculum innovation
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
Educational Change Towards Problem Based Learning: An Organizational Perspective
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
faculty role conflict
higher education reform
Language_English
organizational learning
PA=Available
Price_€100 and above
PS=Active
social constructivism
softlaunch
university transition to active learning

Product details

  • ISBN 9788792982704
  • Weight: 480g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 25 Feb 2014
  • Publisher: River Publishers
  • Publication City/Country: DK
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
As a promising educational approach, PBL (Problem Based Learning) has been adopted by an increasing number of higher education institutions worldwide to replace the traditional lectured based educational approach. However, the organizational change towards PBL is not easy for higher education institutions, especially for those with a long history of Lecture Based Learning. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the challenges and obstacles for higher education institutions which are implementing PBL. In order to address the research concern, this book involves in an intensive exploration of two universities which are transforming their traditional educational approaches to PBL. Specifically, this book is concerned with how managers, staff members, and students interpret PBL and its implementation. It reveals that the challenges for implementing PBL are closely linked to organizational members’ conception of PBL, social learning and motivation at the university. The conclusions are specified as: firstly, the organizational members’ understanding of PBL and social learning are quite diverse, and some of them are not consistent with the managerial attempts. They may create huge tensions or chaos at the university, depending on which strategy the mangers have employed. Further, the organizational members’ understandings of PBL are more concerned with teaching and curriculum design rather than learning, which should be highlighted within PBL context. Besides, staff members have to struggle between different roles due to the complexity of the university in modern society, and some tasks such as researching will distract them from participating in teaching activities and thus undermine PBL implementation. Finally, the university has to make reflections on how to keep a balance between the use of normative approaches to guarantee organizational effectiveness and the intention of giving staff more freedom to make innovations and create new possibilities.

More from this author