Epistemic Duties

Regular price €192.20
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
Alston's Argument
Alston’s Argument
American Robin
Andrew Reisner
Anne Meylan
Anthony Robert Booth
belief
Biological Account
Category=CFA
Category=QDTK
Category=QDTQ
Clayton Littlejohn
dialogical foundationalism
doxastic dilemma
doxastic duties
Doxastic Involuntarism
doxastic justification
Doxastic Practice
Doxastic Voluntarism
Ema Sullivan-Bissett
epistemic duties
Epistemic Justification
epistemic normativity
epistemic obligation
Epistemic Obligations
Epistemic Reasons
epistemic requirements in belief formation
epistemic tension
epistemology
eq_bestseller
eq_dictionaries-language-reference
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
EU Citizen
EU Immigration
Evasive Strategy
evidence
Evidential Fit
evidential normativity
Evidential Trust
functions
Higher Order Evidence
Home Town
implicit bias
implicit bias reduction
Implicit Biases
intellectual responsibility
ISIS Territory
Jennifer Lackey
Jonathan Matheson
Justified Belief
Kevin McCain
Lindsay Rettler
Lisa Bortolotti
Luis Oliveira
Mark T. Nelson
Matthias Steup
Miriam Schleifer McCormick
obligation
open-mindedness
open-mindedness in science
ought to believe
ought to reflect
reasons
reasons for belief
Rebecca Wallbank
Rik Peels
Robert Audi
robust justification
Scott Aikin
Scott Stapleford
Secondhand Smoke
Sharon Ryan
Sophie Stammers
storytelling
Testimonial Injustice
testimonial knowledge
testimony
trust
Young Man

Product details

  • ISBN 9780367141103
  • Weight: 453g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 12 Oct 2020
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

There are arguably moral, legal, and prudential constraints on behavior. But are there epistemic constraints on belief? Are there any requirements arising from intellectual considerations alone? This volume includes original essays written by top epistemologists that address this and closely related questions from a variety of new, sometimes unexpected, angles. It features a wide variety of positions, ranging from arguments for and against the existence of purely epistemic requirements, reductions of epistemic requirements to moral or prudential requirements, the biological foundations of epistemic requirements, extensions of the scope of epistemic requirements to include such things as open-mindedness, eradication of implicit bias and interpersonal duties to object, to new applications such as epistemic requirements pertaining to storytelling, testimony, and fundamentalist beliefs. Anyone interested in the nature of responsibility, belief, or epistemic normativity will find a range of useful arguments and fresh ideas in this cutting-edge anthology.

Chapter 14 of this book is freely available as a downloadable Open Access PDF at http://www.taylorfrancis.com under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

Kevin McCain is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. His published works include: Evidentialism and Epistemic Justification (Routledge, 2014), The Nature of Scientific Knowledge: An Explanatory Approach (2016), and with Kostas Kampourakis Uncertainty: How It Makes Science Advance (2019).

Scott Stapleford is Professor of Philosophy at St. Thomas University, Fredericton. He is the author of Kant’s Transcendental Arguments: Disciplining Pure Reason (2008), coauthor (with Tyron Goldschmidt) of Berkeley’s Principles: Expanded and Explained (Routledge, 2016) and Hume’s Enquiry: Expanded and Explained (Routledge, forthcoming), and coauthor (with Lorne Falkenstein and Molly Kao) of Logic Works: A Rigorous Introduction to Formal Logic (Routledge, forthcoming).