Epistemic Rationality and Epistemic Normativity

Regular price €192.20
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Patrick Bondy
Author_Patrick Bondy
basing relation
belief
Category=QDTK
Category=QDTQ
deliberative guidance
Deontological Terms
Direct Voluntary Control
Doxastic Justification
doxastic voluntarism
Epistemic Evaluation
Epistemic Goal
Epistemic Justification
epistemic normativity
epistemic rationality
Epistemic Reasons
epistemology
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
evidence
Evidential Considerations
evidentialism
Gettier Case
Goldberg's Argument
Goldberg’s Argument
Good Epistemic Reason
Instrumental Conception
instrumental normativity
instrumental rationality
instrumentalism
irrational belief
justification
mental-state ontology
metaethics
Motivating Reasons
Non-epistemic Reason
Non-evidential Considerations
Non-evidential Reason
Normative Reason
normative reasons
normativity
Patrick Bondy
philosophy of action
rational belief
rationality
Reactive Moral Attitudes
reasons for belief formation
Subjective Instrumental
Subjective Motivational Set
Swamping Problem
True Belief
Undefeated Reason
voluntarism

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138220584
  • Weight: 392g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 30 Nov 2017
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

The aim of this book is to answer two important questions about the issue of normativity in epistemology: Why are epistemic reasons evidential and what makes epistemic reasons and rationality normative? Bondy's argument proceeds on the assumption that epistemic rationality goes hand in hand with basing beliefs on good evidence. The opening chapters defend a mental-state ontology of reasons, a deflationary account of how kinds of reasons are distinguished, and a deliberative guidance constraint on normative reasons. They also argue in favor of doxastic voluntarism—the view that beliefs are subject to our direct voluntary control—and embrace the controversial view that voluntarism bears directly on the question of what kinds of things count as reasons for believing. The final three chapters of the book feature a noteworthy critique of the instrumental conception of the nature of epistemic rationality, as well as a defense of the instrumental normativity of epistemic rationality. The final chapter defends the view that epistemic reasons and rationality are normative for us when we have normative reason to get to the truth with respect to some proposition, and it provides a response to the swamping problem for monistic accounts of value.

Patrick Bondy is Assistant Professor at Saint Mary’s University, Canada. He has previously held appointments at Trent University and Brandon University, and a Postdoctoral Fellowship with the Sage School of Philosophy at Cornell University. His research has appeared in Dialogue, Synthese, American Philosophical Quarterly, and Pacific Philosophical Quarterly.

More from this author