Epistemology and the Regress Problem

Regular price €198.40
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Scott Aikin
anti-dogmatism
Aspirationalist Program
Author_Scott Aikin
Basic Beliefs
Can
Category=PDA
Category=QDTK
Category=QDTL
Complete Justifi Cation
Demonstrative Reference
Demonstrative Theory
Diachronic Views
Epistemic Justifi Cation
Epistemology
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_science
Fear
Fi Rst Belief
foundationalism debate
Impure Foundationalism
Inferential Support
Infi Nite Chains
Infi Nite Regress
Infi Nite Series
infinite regress argument
Infinitism
Irrefl Exivity
Justifi Cation
Justifi Ed
Justifi Ed Beliefs
knowledge justification methods
Long Road
metaepistemology
Modest Foundationalism
Reason
Regress Problem
solutions to regress problem
Support P3
Supporting Reasons
theory of justification
Truth Maker

Product details

  • ISBN 9780415878005
  • Weight: 570g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 17 Nov 2010
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

In the last decade, the familiar problem of the regress of reasons has returned to prominent consideration in epistemology. And with the return of the problem, evaluation of the options available for its solution is begun anew. Reason’s regress problem, roughly put, is that if one has good reasons to believe something, one must have good reason to hold those reasons are good. And for those reasons, one must have further reasons to hold they are good, and so a regress of reasons looms. In this new study, Aikin presents a full case for infinitism as a response to the problem of the regress of reasons. Infinitism is the view that one must have a non-terminating chain of reasons in order to be justified. The most defensible form of infinitism, he argues, is that of a mixed theory – that is, epistemic infinitism must be consistent with and integrate other solutions to the regress problem.

Scott F. Aikin is Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at Vanderbilt University.

More from this author