Home » Epistemology of Group Disagreement
Product Image

Epistemology of Group Disagreement

€192.20
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
aggregation
Anna-Maria Asunta Eder
Asbjorn Steglich-Petersen
belief polarization
beliefs
Category=QD
Category=QDTK
Category=QDTQ
Category=QDTS
collective belief formation
collective doxastic agents
collective epistemology
collective intentionality
conciliationism
Condorcet's Jury Theorem
Condorcet’s Jury Theorem
credence
deliberation
disagreement
EL
Epistemic Costs
Epistemic Evaluation
Epistemic Goals
Epistemic Injustice
Epistemic Justification
epistemic liberalism
Epistemic Peers
Epistemic Priorities
Epistemic Responsibility
Epistemic Status
Epistemology
epistemology of disagreement
epistemology of groups
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Erik J. Olsson
evidence
Fernando Broncano-Berrocal
Group Belief
group decision making in science
group disagreement
group epistemology
Group Peer Disagreement
group polarization
Higher Order Evidence
In-group Disagreement
Individual Dissent
inter-group disagreement
intra-group disagreement
Intra-group Disagreements
Intragroup Disagreement
J. Adam Carter
Javier Gonzalez de Prado Salas
Jesus Zamora Bonilla
Joint Commitment
Kristina Rolin
Longino's Account
Longino’s Account
Mattias Skipper Rasmussen
Maura Priest
Mikkel Gerken
Mona Simion
Nathan Sheff
Negative Reliability
Nikolaj Nottelmann
Peer Disagreement
peer disagreement theory
polarization
political epistemology
public reason liberalism
rational deliberation
Real-life disagreement
Reasoning Commitments
Scientific Dissent
Simon Barker
social epistemology
social ontology
Testimonial Injustice
Xavier Donato

Product details

  • ISBN 9780367077426
  • Weight: 453g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 24 Nov 2020
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
Description

This book brings together philosophers to investigate the nature and normativity of group disagreement. Debates in the epistemology of disagreement have mainly been concerned with idealized cases of peer disagreement between individuals. However, most real-life disagreements are complex and often take place within and between groups. Ascribing views, beliefs, and judgments to groups is a common phenomenon that is well researched in the literature on the ontology and epistemology of groups. The chapters in this volume seek to connect these literatures and to explore both intra- and inter- group disagreements. They apply their discussions to a range of political, religious, social, and scientific issues. The Epistemology of Group Disagreement is an important resource for students and scholars working on social and applied epistemology; disagreement; and topics at the intersection of epistemology, ethics, and politics.
About

Fernando Broncano-Berrocal is a Talent Attraction Fellow at the Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain. He works mainly in epistemology, with an emphasis on virtue epistemology, philosophy of luck, social epistemology, and collective epistemology. He is the co-editor, with J. Adam Carter, of The Epistemology of Group Disagreement (Routledge, 2021). His work has appeared in such places as Philosophical Studies, Analysis, Synthese, and Erkenntnis.

J. Adam Carter is Reader in Philosophy at the University of Glasgow, UK. His expertise is mainly in epistemology with particular focus on virtue epistemology, social epistemology relativism, know-how, epistemic luck, and epistemic defeat. He is the author of Metaepistemology and Relativism (2016), co-author of A Critical Introduction to Knowledge-How (2018), and co-editor, with Fernando Broncano-Berrocal, of The Epistemology of Group Disagreement (Routledge, 2021). His work has appeared in Noûs, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophical Studies, Analysis, and the Australasian Journal of Philosophy.