Essays in the Hermeneutics of Science

Regular price €44.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Dimitri Ginev
Argumentative Discourse
Author_Dimitri Ginev
Category=JHB
Constructive Nihilism
Discursive Practices
Effective Historical Consciousness
epistemic rationality
Epistemic Type
Epistemological Foundationalism
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
existential ontology
Experience Distant Concepts
Hermeneutic Medium
Hermeneutic Ontology
Hermeneutic Phenomenology
Human Scientific Research
legitimation crisis
Modern Human Sciences
modernity critique
Non-naturalist Theory
Ontological Finitude
phenomenological philosophy
postmetaphysical hermeneutics dialogue
Primordial Mode
Research Dialogue
rhetorical analysis
Set Theoretic Predicate
Strong Hermeneutics
Structure Functional System
Super Naturalism
Thematizing Project
Theoretical Mode
Transcendental Pragmatics
Vice Versa

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138313019
  • Weight: 200g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 30 Jun 2020
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Published in 1997, this volume is written from a hermenutico-phenomenological point of view. The essays cover a spectrum of relevant issues: the essential interpretation of science; the possibility of a "strong hermeneutics of science" that takes into consideration science's cognitive structure; the implications of existential-ontological interpretations of science for the post-metaphysical dialogue between hermeneutics and epistomology; the place of rhetorical tools in the human sciences; and the strategies of overcoming the legitimation crisis of the human sciences. Because of its commitment to the radical universalization of the hermeneutic problem, the strong programme of hermeneutics of science, suggested in this book, avoids both objectivism and relativism. In this regard, the essays must be read in relation to the search for a middle way between defending epistemic rationality as a basis for futher development of the "project of modernity" and the postmodern deconstruction of all cognitive identities of modernity.

More from this author