Ethics of Argumentation

Regular price €192.20
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Katharina Stevens
applied role-ethics
arguing1+2
argumentation theory
argumentative burdens
Author_Katharina Stevens
Category=CF
Category=GTC
Category=QDTK
Category=QDTL
Category=QDTQ
Category=QDTS
critical thinking
critical thinking pedagogy
deception
deliberative communication ethics
eq_bestseller
eq_dictionaries-language-reference
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
ethical foundations of argument analysis
ethics of argumentation
function claims
function of argumentation
Katharine Stevens
lying
meta-level norm design
moral reasoning
moral reasoning in discourse
normative argumentation theory
role ethics
role shifting
trust

Product details

  • ISBN 9781041073420
  • Weight: 530g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 21 Aug 2025
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This book offers a new approach to the theory of argumentation that conceptualizes argumentation as a fundamentally ethical activity whose norms are grounded in, and must be selected according to, moral reasons.

Current normative approaches to argumentation do not treat ethics as an integral part of argumentation theory. This is at least in part due to a methodological commitment not to address internal states of the arguers, such as intentions and beliefs, which makes moral theorizing about argumentation difficult. This book presents three arguments for why ethics ought to be a central element in normative theorizing about argumentation. Through these arguments it shows, first, that ethics is needed for providing normative argumentation theory with its foundation and for offering arguers reliable guidance for decision- making, both about which norms ought to govern their arguing and how they should shape each argument they make. Second, it addresses some of the most persistent problems faced by currently dominant normative approaches to argumentation, most notably that they are only reliable under the assumption that unrealistic background conditions are fulfilled. Finally, it provides the groundwork for a systematic ethics of argumentation. It does so by showing how a function of argumentation can be justified via moral reasons and by providing the outlines for both an applied ethics of (meta- level) normative argument design and an applied role-ethics of object-level arguing.

The Ethics of Argumentation is essential reading for researchers and graduate students in a wide range of disciplines— including philosophy, communication studies, linguistics, and rhetoric— who are interested in communication, deliberation, argumentation, critical thinking, and social epistemology.

Katharina Stevens is a philosopher and argumentation theorist working at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada. She is one of the editors of the journal Informal Logic and one of the directors of the Critical Thinking and Citizen Engagement Lab at the University of Lethbridge.

More from this author