Eustathii Thessalonicensis exegesis in canonem iambicum pentecostalem

Regular price €280.86
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
automatic-update
B01=Paolo Cesaretti
B01=Silvia Ronchey
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HRCL
Category=NHC
Category=NHDA
Category=NHG
Category=QRMB
Category=QRMF3
Category=QRVG
COP=Germany
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
Eusthatius (von Thessalonike)
Language_Italian
PA=Available
Price_€100 and above
PS=Active
SN=Supplementa Byzantina
softlaunch

Product details

  • ISBN 9783110195217
  • Weight: 1423g
  • Publication Date: 15 Dec 2014
  • Publisher: De Gruyter
  • Publication City/Country: DE
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: Italian
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This volume offers the first critical edition of the vast Commentary on the Pentecostal iambic canon (traditionally ascribed to St John the Damascene) composed by Eustathius, archbishop of Thessalonica. The attribution of the hymn to the Damascene was, in principle, called into question by Eustathius himself, who eventually suggested to have it adopted into Damascene’s paternity only out of ecclesiastical obedience.

The Commentary is probably the last text Eustathius wrote. It can be regarded as the summa of his method of work, his style of exposition, his scholarly interests and literary tastes. Moreover, it can be read as the first Byzantine attempt to create a fusion between a method of work which originated from the exegesis of classical texts and the modes of theological interpretation connected in turn with liturgical experience and pastoral practice.

The edition of the text is accompanied by three apparatuses, a complete range of indices, and exhaustive Prolegomena where the editors shed light on the Commentary as such – its genesis and date, its audience, its discussion of the traditional attribution, its sources – and on history of its manuscript tradition, with a special focus on the Constantinopolitan didaskaleion of Prodromos-Petra.

Silvia Ronchey, Universityof Roma Tre; Paolo Cesaretti, Bergamo University.