Explaining Right and Wrong

Regular price €56.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Benjamin Sachs
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
animal ethics
applied ethics
Atomistic Explanation
Author_Benjamin Sachs
automatic-update
Benjamin Sachs
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HPQ
Category=QDTQ
consequentialism
contractualism
COP=United Kingdom
Deliberative Rationalism
Delivery_Pre-order
Distributive Generalizations
distributive justice
distributive moral concerns
Douglas Portmore
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
ethical pluralism
Explanatory Claims
explanatory ethical frameworks
explanatory intuition
Explanatory Intuitions
Genuine Moral Dilemma
health care allocation
Health Care Resource Distribution
health care resources
intuition
Jeff McMahan
Kantianism
Language_English
medical research on animals
metaethics
monism
moral methodology
Moral Monism
Moral Reasons
Moral Residue
moral theory
moral theory critique
non-distributive moral concerns
Non-normative Fact
non-Rossian pluralism
Normative Ethical Theory
normative ethics
PA=Temporarily unavailable
Pond Case
Price_€20 to €50
Pro Tanto
Pro Tanto Duty
Pro Tanto Obligation
PS=Active
Reflective Equilibrium
Rossian pluralism
Scarce Health Care Resources
Scope Questions
softlaunch
Sufficientarian Principle
Theoretical Virtues
Type Grounding Claim
value theory
Verdictive Facts
Verdictive Intuitions
welfare

Product details

  • ISBN 9780367667337
  • Weight: 290g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 30 Sep 2020
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Explaining Right and Wrong aims to shake the foundations of contemporary ethics by showing that moral philosophers have been deploying a mistaken methodology in their efforts to figure out the truth about what we morally ought to do. Benjamin Sachs argues that moral theorizing makes sense only if it is conceived of as an explanatory project and carried out accordingly. The book goes on to show that the most prominent forms of moral monism—consequentialism, Kantianism, and contractarianism/contractualism—as well as Rossian pluralism, each face devastating explanatory objections. It offers in place of these flawed options a brand-new family of normative ethical theories, non-Rossian pluralism. It then argues that the best kind of non-Rossian pluralism will be spare; in particular, it will deny that an action can be wrong in virtue of constituting a failure to distribute welfare in a particular way or that an action can be wrong in virtue of constituting a failure to rescue. Furthermore, it also aims to show that a great deal of contemporary writing on the distribution of health care resources in cases of scarcity is targeted at questions that either have no answers at all or none that ordinary moral theorizing can uncover.

Benjamin Sachs is a lecturer in philosophy at the University of St. Andrews. He has written on topics in normative ethics, political philosophy, philosophy of law, animal ethics, and coercion. He has papers in journals including Philosophical Studies and The Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

More from this author