Exposing the Roots of Constructivism

Regular price €92.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=R. Scott Smith
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Author_R. Scott Smith
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HPJ
Category=HPK
Category=HRAB
Category=QDTJ
Category=QDTK
Category=QRAB
COP=United States
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
empiricism
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
essential nature
ethics
fact-value dichotomy
history of science
Language_English
PA=Available
particulars
Price_€50 to €100
PS=Active
realism
religious studies
softlaunch
universals

Product details

  • ISBN 9781666912463
  • Weight: 445g
  • Dimensions: 157 x 235mm
  • Publication Date: 20 Oct 2022
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Constructivism dominates over other theories of knowledge in much of western academia, especially the humanities and social sciences. In Exposing the Roots of Constructivism: Nominalism and the Ontology of Knowledge, R. Scott Smith argues that constructivism is linked to the embrace of nominalism, the theory that everything is particular and located in space and time. Indeed, nominalism is sufficient for a view to be constructivist.
However, the natural sciences still enjoy great prestige from the “fact-value split.” They are often perceived as giving us knowledge of the facts of reality, and not merely our constructs. In contrast, ethics and religion, which also have been greatly influenced by nominalism, usually are perceived as giving us just our constructs and opinions.
Yet, even the natural sciences have embraced nominalism, and Smith shows that this will undermine knowledge in those disciplines as well. Indeed, the author demonstrates that, at best, nominalism leaves us with only interpretations, but at worst, it undermines all knowledge whatsoever. However, there are many clear examples of knowledge we do have in the many different disciplines, and therefore those must be due to a different ontology of properties. Thus, nominalism should be rejected. In its place, the author defends a kind of Platonic realism about properties.

R. Scott Smith is professor of philosophy and ethics at Biola University.

More from this author