Fault-Tracing: Against Quine-Duhem

Regular price €26.50
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Sam Mitchell
Author_Sam Mitchell
Category=PDR
Category=QDHR
Category=QDTK
Duhem
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_science

Product details

  • ISBN 9783110996784
  • Weight: 503g
  • Dimensions: 155 x 230mm
  • Publication Date: 18 Jul 2022
  • Publisher: De Gruyter
  • Publication City/Country: DE
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

It is widely believed in philosophy of science that nobody can claim that any verdict of science is forced upon us by the effects of a physical world upon our sense organs and instruments. The Quine-Duhem problem supposedly allows us to resist any conclusion. Views on language aside, Quine is supposed to have shown this decisively.

But it is just false. In many scientific examples, there is simply no room to doubt that a particular hypothesis is responsible for a refutation or established by the observations.

Fault Tracing shows how to play independently established hypotheses against each other to determine whether an arbitrary hypothesis needs to be altered in the light of (apparently) refuting evidence. It analyses real examples from natural science, as well as simpler cases. It argues that, when scientific theories have a structure that prevents them from using this method, the theory looks wrong, and is subject to serious criticism. This is a new, and potentially far-reaching, theory of empirical justification.

Sam Mitchell, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, Massachusetts, USA.

More from this author