From Value to Rightness

Regular price €51.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Vuko Andric
Act Individuation
act-consequentialism
action-guidance
Author_Vuko Andric
Blameless Wrongdoing
Category=QDTQ
Common Sense Morality
consequentialism
Constellation C3
Decision Procedure
decision theory ethics
Deontic Status
Deviant Causal Chain
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Everyday Moral Discourse
expected value moral assessment
factualism
Follow
implementation of moral theories
Kantianism
metaethical analysis
Middle Ground Solutions
moral epistemology
Moral theories
Morally Permissible
Non-paradigmatic Cases
normative ethics
Normative Evidence
Objective Consequentialism
ought implies can
Plausible Moral Theories
Practical Deliberation
practical moral reasoning
Prima Facie Duties
prospectivism
Reason Implies
Rightness
Subjective Consequentialism
subjective moral theories
Surgeon's Duty
Surgeon’s Duty
Susan's Case
Susan’s Case
Tonsillectomy Patients
Uncertain Belief
Vice Versa
Violating
Vuko Andric

Product details

  • ISBN 9780367703844
  • Weight: 453g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 27 May 2024
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This book develops an original version of act-consequentialism. It argues that act-consequentialists should adopt a subjective criterion of rightness.

The book develops new arguments which strongly suggest that, according to the best version of act-consequentialism, the rightness of actions depends on expected rather than actual value. Its findings go beyond the debate about consequentialism and touch on important debates in normative ethics and metaethics. The distinction between criterion of rightness and decision procedures addresses how, why, and in which sense moral theories must be implemented by ordinary persons. The discussion of the rationales of "ought" implies "can" leads to the discovery of a hitherto overlooked moral principle, "ought" implies "evidence", which can be used to show that most prominent moral theories are false. Finally, in the context of discussing cases that are supposed to reveal intuitions that favour either objective or subjective consequentialism, the book argues that which cases are relevant for the discussion of objectivism and subjectivism depends on the type of moral theory we are concerned with (consequentialism, Kantianism, virtue ethics, etc.).

From Value to Rightness will be of interest to scholars and advanced students working in normative ethics and metaethics.

Vuko Andrić is Lecturer at Bayreuth University, a researcher at the Institute for Futures Studies in Stockholm, and Feodor Lynen Research Fellow of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. His research focuses on consequentialism and has been published in international peer-reviewed journals such as Acta Analytica, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Erkenntnis, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, Journal of Global Ethics, Philosophical Studies, Philosophia, Ratio, Religious Studies, Thought, and Utilitas.

More from this author