Government Information Management

Regular price €192.20
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Elliott R. Morss
administrative case studies
Author_Elliott R. Morss
bureaucratic processes
Category=JHB
CIA's Estimate
CIA’s Estimate
citizen well-being
CPSC
CPSC Staff
CPSC Standard
Data Flow Problem
Dbms
Effective Feedback Systems
EPA Water
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Excessive Paperwork
Federal Decision Makers
Federal Evaluations
federal government
federal information management practices
Federal Paperwork
federal paperwork reduction strategies
Formal Evaluation Activities
Government Information Collection
Health Administration
Indirect Food Additive
information overload
Initial Standards
Local Program Manager
management information systems
National Academy
National Electronic Injury Surveillance System
OEO Office
OMB Responsibility
policy evaluation methods
public administration
Sec Staff
TVA Region

Product details

  • ISBN 9780367021658
  • Weight: 590g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 18 Apr 2019
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
In this timely critique of federal procedures, the authors identify the underlying causes of the current overload of information/paper-work in government and explain why the problem cannot be controlled until the causes are eliminated or neutralized. Using a calcuius they have developed for estimating the “value†and “burden†of federal informati
Elliott R. Morss, director of research for Development Alternatives, Inc., served as study director for the Commission on Federal Paperwork. Robert F. Rich, assistant professor of politics and public affairs at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University, previously was research scientist-project director at the Institute for Social Research, Center for Research on the Utilisation of Scientific Knowledge, University of Michigan.

More from this author