A Theory of Justice
A01=W. G. Runciman
Ad hominem
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Altruism
Ambiguity
Analogy
Anti-capitalism
Author_W. G. Runciman
Authoritarianism
automatic-update
Bourgeoisie
Breach of contract
Bribery
Bullshit
Capitalism
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HPS
Category=JFCX
Category=JHB
Category=QDTS
Class conflict
Classless society
Communism
COP=United States
Crime
Criticism
Defection
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
Demagogue
Democracy
Disadvantage
Dissent
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Eugenics
Good and evil
Great books
Hedonism
Henchman
Hostility
Illocutionary act
Indictment
Injunction
Injustice
Insubordination
Irrationality
Just society
Language_English
Manifesto
Multitude
Oligarchy
Opportunism
Ostracism
Overreaction
PA=Available
Pacifism
Pauperism
Philosopher
Philosophy
Pleonexia
Polemic
Political philosophy
Prejudice
Price_€20 to €50
PS=Active
Rebuttal
Ruler
Scarcity (social psychology)
Sedition
Self-interest
Selfishness
Slavery
Social conflict
Sociology
softlaunch
Sophism
Sovereignty
State of nature
Sycophancy
The Communist Manifesto
The Open Society and Its Enemies
The Philosopher
Thomas Hobbes
Timocracy
Tyrant
Unemployment
War
Product details
- ISBN 9780691144764
- Weight: 227g
- Dimensions: 127 x 203mm
- Publication Date: 21 Feb 2010
- Publisher: Princeton University Press
- Publication City/Country: US
- Product Form: Hardback
- Language: English
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
Plato's Republic, Hobbes's Leviathan, and Marx's Communist Manifesto are universally acknowledged classics of Western political thought. But how strong are the core arguments on which they base their visions of the good society that they want to bring into being? In this lively and provocative book, W. G. Runciman shows where and why they fail, even after due allowance has been made for the different historical contexts in which they wrote. Plato, Hobbes, and Marx were all passionately convinced that justice, peace, and order could be established if only their teachings were implemented and the right people put into power. But Runciman makes a powerful case to the effect that all three were irredeemably naive in their assumptions about how human societies function and evolve and how human behavior could be changed. Yet despite this, Runciman insists that Republic, Leviathan, and The Communist Manifesto remain great books. Born of righteous anger and frustration, they are masterfully eloquent pleas for better worlds--worlds that Plato, Hobbes, and Marx cannot bring themselves to admit to be unattainable.
W. G. Runciman is a fellow of Trinity College, University of Cambridge. His books include "The Social Animal" and "The Theory of Cultural and Social Selection".
