High-Bounty Men in the Army of the Potomac
Regular price
€39.99
Regular price
€52.99
Sale
Sale price
€39.99
14 days return policy
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Edwin P. Rutan II
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Author_Edwin P. Rutan II
automatic-update
Battle of Second Reams' Station
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HBWJ
Category=NHK
Category=NHW
Civil War draft
Combat effectiveness
COP=United States
Delivery_Pre-order
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=0
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
Five Forks
Fort Stedman
High number regiments
Language_English
Lewis Farm
PA=Not yet available
Price_€20 to €50
PS=Forthcoming
softlaunch
Union desertion
White Oak
Product details
- ISBN 9781606354865
- Dimensions: 156 x 235mm
- Publication Date: 03 Sep 2024
- Publisher: Kent State University Press
- Publication City/Country: US
- Product Form: Paperback
- Language: English
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
Reassessing the motivations and contribution of Union soldiers come late to the war
For more than a century, historians have disparaged the men who joined the Union army in the later days of the Civil War––when higher bounty payments and the conditional draft were in effect––as unpatriotic mercenaries who made poor soldiers and contributed little to the Union victory. However, as Edwin P. Rutan II explains, historians have relied on the accounts of 1861 and 1862 veterans who resented these new recruits who had not yet suffered the hardships of war, and they were jealous of the higher bounties those recruits received. The result, he argues, is a long-standing mischaracterization of the service of 750,000 Union soldiers.
High-Bounty Men in the Army of the Potomac offers a much-needed correction to the historical record, providing a more balanced assessment of the "high-bounty" replacements in the Army of the Potomac. Rutan argues, using combat-effectiveness methodology, that they were generally competent soldiers and indispensable in defeating the Army of Northern Virginia. He also examines the issue of financial motivation, concluding that the volunteers of 1862 may have been more driven by economic incentives than once thought, and 1864 recruits were less driven by this than typically described. Thus, Rutan concludes that the Union "high-bounty" men do not deserve the scorn heaped on them by early volunteers and subsequent generations of historians.
For more than a century, historians have disparaged the men who joined the Union army in the later days of the Civil War––when higher bounty payments and the conditional draft were in effect––as unpatriotic mercenaries who made poor soldiers and contributed little to the Union victory. However, as Edwin P. Rutan II explains, historians have relied on the accounts of 1861 and 1862 veterans who resented these new recruits who had not yet suffered the hardships of war, and they were jealous of the higher bounties those recruits received. The result, he argues, is a long-standing mischaracterization of the service of 750,000 Union soldiers.
High-Bounty Men in the Army of the Potomac offers a much-needed correction to the historical record, providing a more balanced assessment of the "high-bounty" replacements in the Army of the Potomac. Rutan argues, using combat-effectiveness methodology, that they were generally competent soldiers and indispensable in defeating the Army of Northern Virginia. He also examines the issue of financial motivation, concluding that the volunteers of 1862 may have been more driven by economic incentives than once thought, and 1864 recruits were less driven by this than typically described. Thus, Rutan concludes that the Union "high-bounty" men do not deserve the scorn heaped on them by early volunteers and subsequent generations of historians.
Edwin P. Rutan II is a retired lawyer who graduated from Harvard Law School. He is the author of "If I Have Got to Go and Fight, I Am Willing": A Union Regiment Forged in the Petersburg Campaign: The 179th New York Volunteer Infantry 1864–1865.
