Human Rights and Counter-terrorism in America's Asia Policy

Regular price €223.20
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Rosemary Foot
America's Asia policy
Anti-terrorist Struggle
Author_Rosemary Foot
Category=JP
Category=NHW
China Democracy Party
China's Human Rights Record
Chinese Government
Congressional Executive Commission
Counter-terrorism policies
counterterrorism law
DRL
East Timor
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
ETIM
executive legislative dynamics
External Human Rights Policy
Human Right NGO
Human rights
international relations theory
International Religious Freedom
International Religious Freedom Act
Jemaah Islamiah
legislative impact analysis
NGO Community
NSS
OIC
Pakistan's Nuclear Ambitions
Secretary Of State
Security Council Sanctions Committee
security studies
Southeast Asian politics
Special Interagency Group
UN
US domestic legislation
US foreign policy human rights conflict
USA
USA Patriot Act
Violated

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138436138
  • Weight: 340g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 28 Jul 2017
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This book examines the effects of the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington of 11 September 2001 on America's human rights and counter-terrorism policies towards a number of countries in Asia. Five countries have been chosen for examination, divided into two front-lines states (Pakistan and Uzbekistan), two second-front countries (Indonesia and Malaysia), and a third-front country, China. The paper also looks at changes in US domestic legislation and its treatment of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere in order to analyse the extent to which the US promotion of an external human rights policy might also have been compromised by its own legislative changes as a result of the struggle against terrorism.
The paper concludes that the attacks on US territory, overall, have constrained America's willingness and capacity to promote an external human rights policy with respect to these five countries. However, some attention - especially at the rhetorical level - to these countries' human rights records has been retained to differing degrees among the five states. This degree of difference is not explained entirely in reference to a country's perceived centrality to the struggle against terrorism. It depends on the extent to which the US executive and legislative branches are united - either singly or in combination - in their disapproval of a state's record, or in their understanding about how best to reach the policy goals that are sought.

More from this author