1960s
1970s
1980s
1990s
2000s
20th century
A01=John G. Geer
academic
ads
advertising
america
american
Author_John G. Geer
benefit
bias
bush
campaigning
candidates
Category=JPWC
clinton
deception
democracy
elections
electorate
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=0
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
gore
historical
history
journalism
journalist
lies
myth
negative
obama
political
politics
president
pundit
qualifications
scholarly
slander
strategy
united states
usa
voter
votes
voting
Product details
- ISBN 9780226284996
- Weight: 369g
- Dimensions: 16 x 23mm
- Publication Date: 01 Mar 2006
- Publisher: The University of Chicago Press
- Publication City/Country: US
- Product Form: Paperback
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
Americans tend to see negative campaign ads as just that: negative. Pundits, journalists, voters, and scholars frequently complain that such ads undermine elections and even democratic government itself. But John G. Geer here takes the opposite stance, arguing that when political candidates attack each other, raising doubts about each other's views and qualifications, voters - and the democratic process - benefit. "In Defense of Negativity", Geer's study of negative advertising in presidential campaigns from 1960 to 2004, asserts that the proliferating attack ads are far more likely than positive ads to focus on salient political issues, rather than politicians' personal characteristics. Accordingly, the ads enrich the democratic process, providing voters with relevant and substantial information before they head to the polls. An important and timely contribution to American political discourse, "In Defense of Negativity" concludes that if we want campaigns to grapple with relevant issues and address real problems, negative ads just might be the solution.
John G. Geer is professor of political science at Vanderbilt University. He is the editor of the Journal of Politics, the editor of Politicians and Party Politics, and the author of Nominating Presidents: An Evaluation of Voters and Primaries and From Tea Leaves to Opinion Polls: Politicians, Information, and Leadership.
