Regular price €62.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Craig M. White
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
American Government
Author_Craig M. White
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HBLX
Category=HBWS5
Category=JPS
Category=NHWL
Category=NHWR9
COP=United States
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
Diplomacy
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Ethics
ethics and moral philosophy
Language_English
PA=Available
Policy and Law
Political Science
Price_€50 to €100
PS=Active
social and political philosophy
softlaunch
US Foreign Policy

Product details

  • ISBN 9780739138946
  • Weight: 463g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 19 Mar 2010
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Paperback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Iraq: The Moral Reckoning applies classic just war theory to the U.S. decision to go to war in 2003. That theory, which evolved over several millennia, is a simple, profound tool for evaluating the rightness and wisdom of starting a war. The Bush administration and its supporters referred directly and indirectly to the theory in making a pro-war case to the world. The theory provides three core moral criteria for a just war: sovereign authority, just cause, and right intention (which includes an aim of peace). It adds three practical criteria: proportionality of ends, last resort, and reasonable chance of success. For a just war, each criterion should be substantially met. Since war is destructive and each country is presumed to have the right to live in peace, the evidence in favor of war must be clearly stronger than evidence against it.

For each criterion, Iraq: The Moral Reckoning painstakingly weighs Bush administration statements, or those of its supporters, against evidence available at the time. A wide range of viewpoints and evidence is considered, and contrary arguments are refuted. One full chapter is given to neoconservative arguments on just war theory and its application from prominent war supporters. Each criterion, except sovereign authority, is shown not to have been met. The book concludes with a discussion of the implications of an unjust war for the United States and the world.

The intensive weighing of each criterion against the facts and the balanced approach make the book unique. By demonstrating a comprehensive application of the theory to one war, it not only sets a new standard for evaluating the 2003 Iraq war, but also shows how present and future wars can be better evaluated in moral and practical terms, based on knowledge available at the time.

Craig M. White is public affairs officer at the U.S. embassy in Port Louis, Mauritius.

More from this author