Is There a God?

Regular price €192.20
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Graham Oppy
A01=Kenneth L. Pearce
analytic philosophy
Argument From Religious Experience
Author_Graham Oppy
Author_Kenneth L. Pearce
Autonomous Facts
Brute Contingencies
Category=QDTJ
Category=QDTK
Category=QRAB
Doxastic Practice
Einstein's Field Equations
Einstein’s Field Equations
epistemic justification
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
ethical foundations debate
Euthyphro Dilemma
Expert Consensus
God's Choice
God’s Choice
Graham's Claims
Graham's View
Graham’s Claims
Graham’s View
Horrendous Evil
Horrendous Suffering
Ideological Simplicity
Logical Consequence
metaphysical explanation
Minded Organisms
Modal Ontological Argument
naturalism vs theism
Non-causal Explanation
Non-natural Agents
philosophical arguments for existence
philosophy of religion
Pink Elephant
Real Definition
Reidian Epistemology
Religious Experience
Theistic Worldviews
Theological Determinism
Theoretical Commitments

Product details

  • ISBN 9780367243937
  • Weight: 620g
  • Dimensions: 138 x 216mm
  • Publication Date: 13 Oct 2021
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Bertrand Russell famously quipped that he didn’t believe in God for the same reason that he didn’t believe in a teapot in orbit between the earth and Mars: it is a bizarre assertion for which no evidence can be provided. Is belief in God really like belief in Russell’s teapot? Kenneth L. Pearce argues that God is no teapot. God is a real answer to the deepest question of all: why is there something rather than nothing? Graham Oppy argues that we should believe that there are none but natural causal entities with none but natural causal properties—and hence should believe that there are no gods. Beginning from this basic disagreement, the authors proceed to discuss and debate a wide range of philosophical questions, including questions about explanation, necessity, rationality, religious experience, mathematical objects, the foundations of ethics, and the methodology of philosophy. Each author first presents his own side, and then they interact through two rounds of objections and replies.

Pedagogical features include standard form arguments, section summaries, bolded key terms and principles, a glossary, and annotated reading lists. In the volume foreword, Helen De Cruz calls the debate "both edifying and a joy," and sums up what’s at stake: "Here you have two carefully formulated positive proposals for worldviews that explain all that is: classical theism, or naturalistic atheism. You can follow along with the authors and deliberate: which one do you find more plausible?"

Though written with beginning students in mind, this debate will be of interest to philosophers at all levels and to anyone who values careful, rational thought about the nature of reality and our place in it.

Graham Oppy, FAHA, is Professor of Philosophy at Monash University in Australia. His authored books include Arguing About Gods (2006), Philosophical Perspectives on Infinity (2006), The Best Argument Against God (2013), Describing Gods (2014), Reinventing Philosophy of Religion (2014), Naturalism and Religion (2018), Atheism and Agnosticism (2018), and Atheism: The Basics (2019).

Kenneth L. Pearce is Ussher Assistant Professor in Berkeley Studies at Trinity College Dublin. He has published extensively on philosophy of religion and the history of early modern philosophy, and was the winner of the 2016 Sanders Prize in Philosophy of Religion. He is the author of Language and the Structure of Berkeley’s World (2017) and co-editor (with Tyron Goldschmidt) of Idealism: New Essays in Metaphysics (2017).

Helen De Cruz is Professor of Philosophy and the Danforth Chair in the Humanities at Saint Louis University, USA.

More from this author