John Locke's Theology

Regular price €87.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Jonathan S. Marko
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Author_Jonathan S. Marko
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HRC
Category=HRCM
Category=QRM
Category=QRVG
COP=United States
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Language_English
PA=Available
Price_€50 to €100
PS=Active
softlaunch

Product details

  • ISBN 9780197650042
  • Weight: 649g
  • Dimensions: 237 x 163mm
  • Publication Date: 07 Aug 2023
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press Inc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
In John Locke's Theology: An Ecumenical, Irenic, and Controversial Project, Jonathan S. Marko offers the closest work available to a theological system derived from the writings of John Locke. Marko argues that Locke's intent for The Reasonableness of Christianity, his most noted theological work, was to describe and defend his version of the fundamental doctrines of Christianity and not his personal theological views. Locke, Marko says, intended the work to be an ecumenical and irenic project during a controversial time in philosophy and theology. Locke described what qualifies someone as a Christian in simple and irenic terms, and argued for the necessity of Scripture and the reasonableness of God's means of conveying his authoritative messages. The Reasonableness of Christianity could be construed as personal, but mainly in the sense that it puts the burden of understanding Scripture and arriving at theological convictions on the autonomous individual, rejecting the notion that one should base one's doctrinal opinions on so-called authorities. His work was inadvertently controversial partly because then, like today, readers typically failed to make a distinction between Locke's personal and programmatic positions. Marko also points to places in Locke's corpus where he avoids advocating for a particular sectarian position in his treatment of theological doctrines. What is more, it shows why attempting to categorize Locke--a philosopher, theologian, and political scientist all at once--according to traditional Christian paradigms is a dangerous misstep and a difficult scholarly feat.
Dr. Jonathan S. Marko is Associate Professor of Philosophical and Systematic Theology at Cornerstone University in Grand Rapids, Michigan. His primary areas of research are theological and philosophical thinkers, debates, and thought systems that arose in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, especially in Britain.

More from this author