Justice, Legitimacy, and Diversity

Regular price €61.50
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
Basic Legitimation Demand
Category=JHB
Category=JP
Category=JPA
Category=JPH
Competent Decision Makers
Comprehensive Doctrine
Consent Theory
consent tradition
Dali Lama
democratic
democratic theory
Eligible Set
Endorsement Test
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
equal
Equal Moral Persons
Equal Respect
Equally Competent
ethical pluralism
Factual Connotation
Good Life
horton
Human Rights
imperfect
Imperfect Procedural Justice
john
Kantian Contractualism
liberal democracy legitimacy debates
normative authority
Objective Social Meaning
Overlapping Consensus
Perfect Procedural Justice
Pluralist Integration
political
political philosophy
procedural
procedural justice
proceduralism
Procedure Independent Standards
pure
Pure Procedural Justice
Pure Proceduralism
respect
Vice Versa

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138109469
  • Weight: 330g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 24 May 2017
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Most contemporary political philosophers take justice—rather than legitimacy—to be the fundamental virtue of political institutions vis-à-vis the challenges of ethical diversity. Justice-driven theorists are primarily concerned with finding mutually acceptable terms to arbitrate the claims of conflicting individuals and groups. Legitimacy-driven theorists, instead, focus on the conditions under which those exercising political authority on an ethically heterogeneous polity are entitled to do so. But what difference would it make to the management of ethical diversity in liberal democratic societies if legitimacy were prior to or independent from justice?

This question identifies a widely underexplored issue whose theoretical salience shows how the understanding of what constitutes the primary question of political philosophy has a deep impact on how practical political questions are interpreted and addressed. What difference would it make, for example, whether the difficulties concerning the safeguard of human rights were couched in terms of the justice or of the legitimacy of the documents and treaties sanctioning their implementation. How should the issue of the quality of democracies be addressed whether one assigned priority to the justice or legitimacy of democratic institutions? Addressing these and other topical questions, the book offers a new theoretical angle from which to consider a number of pressing social and political issues.

This book was previously published as a special issue of the Critical Review of Social and Political Philosophy.

Emanuela Ceva is Assistant Professor of Political Philosophy at the University of Pavia. She has published on themes of procedural justice, pluralism and respect for dissenting minorities and she is completing a monograph on value conflicts in politics. Enzo Rossi is Senior Research Fellow in Social Philosophy at the University of Wales, Newport. His published work focuses mainly on the theoretical foundations of liberal democracy, with particular attention to problems of legitimacy and realism. He is completing a book on the liberal political tradition.