Kant’s Inferentialism

Regular price €204.60
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=David Landy
analytic philosophy
Analytic Propositions
Author_David Landy
Can
Category=QDHM
Category=QDTM
causal cognition
causal laws
Complex Idea
concepts-qua-inferential-rules
Copy Principle
Critique of Pure Reason
David Landy
Determinate Temporal Order
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Fi Ll
Hume
Hume's Copy Principle
Hume's Theory
Hume’s Copy Principle
Hume’s Theory
inferentialism
inferentialism in Kantian epistemology
Kant
Kant's Argument
Kant's Inferentialism
Kant's Theory
Kant’s Argument
Kant’s Theory
Material Rules
mental representation
mental representation theory
Mere Alteration
Metaphysical Deduction
Meter Stick
Necessarily Connected
non-conceptual representation
Nonconceptual Representations
perception and judgment
Perceptual Synthesis
philosophy of mind
Pictorial Content
representation of objects
Representational Content
Representational Copy Principle
SBN
Subjunctive Conditionals
substance
transcendental deduction
transcendental idealism
transcendental philosophy
Treatise of Human Nature

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138913080
  • Weight: 566g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 10 Apr 2015
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Kant’s Inferentialism draws on a wide range of sources to present a reading of Kant’s theory of mental representation as a direct response to the challenges issued by Hume in A Treatise of Human Nature. Kant rejects the conclusions that Hume draws on the grounds that these are predicated on Hume’s theory of mental representation, which Kant refutes by presenting objections to Hume’s treatment of representations of complex states of affairs and the nature of judgment. In its place, Kant combines an account of concepts as rules of inference with a detailed account of perception and of the self as the locus of conceptual norms to form a complete theory of human experience as an essentially rule-governed enterprise aimed at producing a representation of the world as a system of objects necessarily connected to one another via causal laws. This interpretation of the historical dialectic enriches our understanding of both Hume and Kant and brings to bear Kant’s insights into mental representation on contemporary debates in philosophy of mind. Kant’s version of inferentialism is both resistant to objections to contemporary accounts that cast these as forms of linguistic idealism, and serves as a remedy to misplaced Humean scientism about representation.

David Landy is Associate Professor of Philosophy at San Francisco State University, USA

More from this author