Knowledge and Social Structure (RLE Social Theory)

Regular price €137.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Peter Hamilton
analysis
Ascetic Protestantism
Author_Peter Hamilton
Bourgeois Economic Theory
Bourgeois Social Science
Category=JHBA
class
classical sociological theory
Cognitive Evolution
consciousness
der
determinate
Dialectical Method
Enlightenment philosophy
entzauberung
Entzauberung Der Welt
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Frankfurt School thinkers
Group Soul
Holy Men
Husserl's Attack
Marxist analysis
Natural Science Paradigms
Paris Manuscripts
phenomenological sociology
Potential Consciousness
proletarian
Proletarian Class Consciousness
Reificatory Processes
relationship
Rheinische Zeitung
Scheler's Theory
schelerian
Schelerian Sociology
Scheler’s Theory
Scienza Nuova
Simplest Classificatory System
social context of intellectual production
Social Stock
sociology
sociology of knowledge
Traditional Props
Vice Versa
Weber's Sociological Work
Weberian Social Theory
Weber’s Sociological Work
Young Hegelians

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138790957
  • Weight: 490g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 08 Aug 2014
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

The primary concern of this study is to present, elucidate and analyse the developments which have characterized the sociology of knowledge, and which have set for it the outlines of its major problematics. Peter Hamilton examines the most distinctive approaches to the determinate relationship between knowledge and social structure. He considers the three main ‘pre-paradigms’ of the sociology of knowledge based on the work of Marx, Durkheim and Weber, and looks at the contribution of Scheler, Mannheim and phenomenological studies to this complex field. He explores the intellectual context, particularly that of Enlightenment philosophy, in which the problems involved in producing a sociology of knowledge first came to light. In conclusion, the author suggests an inclusive perspective for approaching the difficulties posed in any attempt to describe and explain relations between knowledge and social structure.

More from this author