Land Based Air Power or Aircraft Carriers?
Regular price
€198.40
A01=Gjert Lage Dyndal
arm
Author_Gjert Lage Dyndal
British defence policy
Category=JWCM
Category=JWK
Category=NHW
coastal
Cold War military history
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
fleet
forces
HMS Albion
HMS Ark
HMS Ark Royal
HMS Bulwark
HMS Invincible
HMS Victorious
inter-service rivalry
iru
island
Island Strategy
Land Based Air Power
maritime
Maritime Air Power
maritime security analysis
military strategic studies
NATO Document
NATO Focus
NATO Maritime
NATO Military Authority
NATO Strategy
NATO Threat
NATO's Northern Flank
NATO’s Northern Flank
Naval Forces
QHHG IRU
RAF
RI WKH
Royal Air Force
Royal Navy Air Force relations
Soviet Naval
Soviet Naval Forces
STOL Aircraft
strategy
task
UK maritime air power debate 1960s
wkh
Product details
- ISBN 9781409433354
- Weight: 576g
- Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
- Publication Date: 28 Apr 2012
- Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
- Publication City/Country: GB
- Product Form: Hardback
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
During the 1960s - in the midst of its retreat from empire - the British government had to grapple with complex political and military problems in order to find a strategic defence policy that was both credible and affordable. Addressing what was perhaps the most contentious issue within those debates, this book charts the arguments that raged between supporters of a land based air power strategy, and those who favoured aircraft carriers. Drawing upon a wealth of previously classified documents, the book reveals how the Admiralty and Air Ministry became interlocked in a bitter political struggle over which of their military strategies could best meet Britain's future foreign policy challenges. Whilst the broad story of this inter-service rivalry is well known - the Air Force's proposal for a series of island based airfields, and the Navy championing of a small number of expensive but mobile aircraft carriers - the complexity and previous lack of archival sources means that it has, until now, only ever been partially researched and understood. Former studies have largely focused on the cancellation of the CVA-01 carrier programme, and offered little depth as regards the Royal Air Force perspectives. Given that this was a two-Service rivalry, which greatly influenced many aspects of British foreign and defence policy decisions of the period, this book presents an important and balanced overview of the complex issues involved. Through this historical study of the British debate about maritime air power and strategic alternatives in the 1960s, the detailed arguments used for and against both alternatives demonstrate clear relevance to both historical and contemporary conceptual debates on carrier forces and land-based air power. Both from military strategy and inter-service relationship perspectives, contemporary Britain and many other nations with maritime forces may learn much from this historical case.
Lt. Colonel Gjert Lage Dyndal is Dean of Academics at the Royal Norwegian Air Force Academy. From 2003 to 2005 he was Head of the Maritime Air Power Section at the Royal Norwegian Naval Warfare Centre. He was awarded his PhD from the University of Glasgow in 2009 and is author of three previous books, 'Trenchard and Slessor: On the Supremacy of Air Power over Sea Power' (2007); 'Strategisk ledelse i krise og krig' [Strategic Leadership in Crisis and War] (2010), and 'Exit Afghanistan' (with prof Torbjorn Knutsen) (2012) .
