Landmark Essays on Voice and Writing

Regular price €56.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
academic writing style
authorial identity
Category=CBW
Category=DSA
composition pedagogy
Discourse in Art
Discourse in Life
eq_bestseller
eq_biography-true-stories
eq_dictionaries-language-reference
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
Ethos Versus Persona
Evangelic Composition
Postmodem Age
rhetorical theory
self representation
Speaking Voice
Talking Back to the Speaker
textual authority
Voice as Juice
voice in academic discourse
Word as Sound

Product details

  • ISBN 9781880393079
  • Weight: 560g
  • Dimensions: 178 x 254mm
  • Publication Date: 01 Nov 1995
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Inc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Section 1 of this volume describes three major debates about voice. They include:
* the overarching debate: discourse as text vs. discourse as voice;
* the traditional debate in rhetoric: ethos as real virtue in the real person vs. ethos as the appearance of virtue; and
* the modern debate: voice as self vs. voice as role.
These debates involve large, ideological questions about the nature of self or identity and about the relation of the text to the writer. They are all the more troublesome and unresolvable because they tend to be cast in binary, either/or terms.

Section 2 responds to these debates by showing that they don't need to be resolved in either/or terms. Looking carefully at the term voice shows that it has some fairly noncontroversial meanings when applied to writing. Thus, most of this section is devoted to an extended exploration of a family of five meanings for the term voice in writing -- audible voice or information, dramatic voice, recognizable or distinctive voice, voice with authority, and resonant voice or presence. These meanings make the concept of voice solid and usable apart from the theoretical debates.

The two theoretical debates only come up in relatively circumscribed arenas and so don't muddy most uses of the concept of voice in writing. In short, Elbow's hope is that he can make descriptive claims about the meanings of voice in writing about which people from various ideological camps will be able to agree.