Law and Islamic Dress

Regular price €72.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Dr Kimberley Brayson
A01=Kimberley Brayson
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Author_Dr Kimberley Brayson
Author_Kimberley Brayson
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=LAB
Category=LAQG
Category=LNDC
colonialism
COP=United Kingdom
decolonialism
Delivery_Pre-order
ECtHR
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
European Court of Human Rights
feminism
Islamic culture
Islamophobia
Language_English
multiculturalism
Muslim women
neo-Marxism
PA=Not yet available
patriarchy
Price_€50 to €100
PS=Active
Sahin v Turkey
SAS v France
softlaunch

Product details

  • ISBN 9781509910496
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 07 Mar 2024
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
This book conceptualises European Court of Human Rights’ judgments on Islamic dress as manifestations of the fascist impulse in modern human rights law. The author argues that human rights are thus not an antidote to fascism but are constituted through a fascist inflection and implicated in circulating fascism in the everyday. The inability of human rights to say ‘no’ to laws regulating and criminalising Islamic dress in Europe engenders an institutional Islamophobia in the law and Islamic dress debate in Europe. The author interrogates the historical emergence of human rights, through a methodology of interdisciplinary, theoretical oscillations between feminism, decolonial, phenomenological and neo-Marxist thought to establish the rights/fascism dialectic. She argues that beyond exclusion and erasure the ownership of rights discourse enables the exploitation of racialised and gendered bodies for the maintenance of material and epistemological privilege with a white, Christian, male norm. It is this moment of ownership, where rights are both propertied and property, that constitutes the rights/fascism dialectic. The author goes on to argue that the rights/fascism dialectic operates at the heart of the Islamic dress debate in Europe to create the impossibility and instrumentalisation of Muslim women’s bodies in European public space. The book challenges shifting legal justifications by exposing the functioning of capital, colonialism, patriarchy and power at the European Court of Human Rights in key cases such as Sahin v Turkey and SAS v France. Theoretical insights of the rights/fascism dialectic are applied to the law and Islamic dress debate in the multicultural UK, assimilationist France and at the ECtHR. The conclusion is that the Islamic dress debate in Europe manifests the gender and racial differentiation and instrumentalisation that is essential to the maintenance of human rights and the modern, capitalist state in which rights are enmeshed.
Kimberley Brayson is Lecturer in Law and Director of Learning and Teaching at Leicester Law School, UK.

More from this author