adjudication theory
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Analyze
Argum Ent
Argum Entation
automatic-update
B01=Fernando Atria Lemaitre
B01=Neil MacCormick
Brute Empirical Fact
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=JB
Category=JF
COP=United Kingdom
Delivery_Pre-order
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
FERNANDO ATRIA
Follow
General Practical Discourse
Goal Reason
Iffe Ren
institutional analysis
Interpretation
Interpretative Arguments
Interpreting Statutes
Ith Respect
Judgem Ent
jurisprudence
Kripke's Argument
Kripke's Case
Kripke’s Argument
Kripke’s Case
Lain Tiff
Language_English
Legal
legal hermeneutics
Legal Reasoning
normative reasoning
objectivity in legal scholarship
Op Cit
PA=Temporarily unavailable
Price_€100 and above
Prom Ises
PS=Active
Rightness Norm
Rightness Reasons
Sim Ilar
Skeptical Paradox
softlaunch
Sources Thesis
statutory interpretation
Unlim Ited
Younger Men
Product details
- ISBN 9781138715578
- Weight: 1260g
- Dimensions: 169 x 244mm
- Publication Date: 14 Sep 2017
- Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
- Publication City/Country: GB
- Product Form: Hardback
- Language: English
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
This title was first published in 2003. Leading contemporary essays on interpretation are assembled in this volume, which offsets them against a small number of "classical" works from earlier periods. It has long been recognized that textual sources (constitutions, statutes, precedents, commentaries) are central to developed systems of law and that interpretation of such texts is one highly important element in adjudication, legal practice and legal scholarship. Scholars have also contended that the totality of legal activity is "interpretive" in a wider sense and debates about objectivity have raged. The reasons for this development are here critically scrutinized.
Fernando Atria Lemaitre, Neil MacCormick
