Legitimising the Use of Force in International Politics

Regular price €61.50
Quantity:
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Corneliu Bjola
Anticipatory Self-defense
argumentative
Argumentative Reasoning
Author_Corneliu Bjola
Category=QDTQ
Chapter VII
communicative action approach
community
council
customary
deliberative
deliberative democracy
Deliberative Legitimacy
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Human Suffering
humanitarian intervention
Independent International Commission
International Humanitarian Law
international relations theory
interpretative
Iraq's WMD
Iraq's WMD Program
Kosovar Albanians
legitimacy
legitimacy standards for military intervention
moral philosophy in warfare
NATO Attack
NATO Campaign
NATO Government
NATO Intervention
NATO Leader
NATO Member
NATO Military
NATO's Action
NATO's Decision
post-Cold War conflicts
reasoning
relevant
Relevant Interpretative Community
security
Security Council
Security Council 1990b
UN
WMD Program

Product details

  • ISBN 9780415619240
  • Weight: 410g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 01 Jan 2011
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This book aims to examine the conditions under which the decision to use force can be reckoned as legitimate in international relations. Drawing on communicative action theory, it provides a provocative answer to the hotly contested question of how to understand the legitimacy of the use of force in international politics.

The use of force is one of the most critical and controversial aspects of international politics. Scholars and policy-makers have long tried to develop meaningful standards capable of restricting the use of force to a legally narrow yet morally defensible set of circumstances. However, these standards have recently been challenged by concerns over how the international community should react to gross human rights abuses or to terrorist threats. This book argues that current legal and moral standards on the use of force are unable to effectively deal with these challenges.

The author argues that the concept of 'deliberative legitimacy', understood as the non-coerced commitment of an actor to abide by a decision reached through a process of communicative action, offers the most appropriate framework for addressing this problem. The theoretical originality and empirical value of the concept of deliberative legitimacy comes fully into force with the examination of two of the most severe international crises from the post Cold War period: the 1999 NATO intervention in Kosovo and the 2003 US military action against Iraq.

This book will be of much interest to students of international security, ethics, international law, discourse theory and IR.

Corneliu Bjola is SSHRC Postdoctoral Fellow with the Centre for Ethics at the University of Toronto, and has a PhD in International Relations.

Corneliu Bjola is a Lecturer and a Fellow of St Cross College at the University of Oxford.

More from this author