Li Da And Marxist Philosophy In China

Regular price €44.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Nick Knight
Ai Siqi
Animal Kingdom
Author_Nick Knight
Category=JPA
Category=JPFC
Category=QDHC
Chen Duxiu
chinese
Chinese Communist Party
Chinese intellectual history
communist
conception
Contemporary Society
Contemporary Sociology
Deng Xiaoping's Strategy
dialectical
Dialectical Materialism
epistemology in philosophy
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Fei Xiaotong
Great Excitment
historical materialism
Japanese Marxists
Kawakami Hajime
Li Da
Li's Critique
Li's Elaborations
mao
Mao Zedong
Mao Zedong Thought
Mao's Annotations
Marxist philosophy in twentieth century China
materialism
materialist
Materialist Conception
National People's Congress
party
revolutionary theory
Shanghai Edition
social theory development
sociology of knowledge
Soviet Marxist Philosophy
Soviet Texts
Takabatake Motoyuki
thought
Vice Versa
zedong

Product details

  • ISBN 9780813336398
  • Weight: 453g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 06 Oct 1998
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Inc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
"Scholars of Marxism will be in Nick Knight's debt for this pioneering study of one of the most important figures in the development of Marxism in China. Knight makes an important case about the relationship of Chinese Marxist thought to Marxist thought in general (with particular attention to Soviet Marxism). The book makes available to readers not just important texts of Chinese Marxism, but a whole series of texts of Marxism that were crucial to the political discourse of the thirties. Knight displays impressive erudition and command of these texts. In spite of the strong case he makes for his thesis, he retains throughout an admirable critical self-awareness that enhances the plausibility of his argument." —Arif DirlikDuke University

More from this author