Limits of Intelligibility

Regular price €51.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
Adrian W. Moore
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Alan Turing
Analytic Judgements
Andrea Kern
Aron Schwertner
automatic-update
B01=Jens Pier
bounded limitation
bounds of sense
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=CFA
Category=HP
Category=HPK
Category=JFCX
Category=QDH
Category=QDTK
cognition
Cognize Objects
Confer
COP=United Kingdom
David Suarez
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
Dense
Diamond's View
Diamond’s View
Early German Romantics
epistemology
eq_bestseller
eq_dictionaries-language-reference
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
Experiential Laws
finite knowledge
Form Matter Distinction
Fritz Mauthner
G. Anthony Bruno
General Logical Laws
Gottlob Frege
Graham Priest
Guido Kreis
Hans-Johann Glock
hylomorphic conception of knowledge
Infinite Judgment
intelligibility
Jens Pier
Jocelyn Benoist
Juliet Floyd
Kant
Kant's Theoretical Philosophy
Kant’s Theoretical Philosophy
Language_English
limits of human understanding in philosophy
limits of language
Logical Alien
logical positivism
Logical Propositions
Logical Relations
making sense
metaphysics
moral philosophy
nonsense
Ocular Irradiation
PA=Available
phenomenology
philosophy of language
philosophy of logic
Pirmin Stekeler-Weithofer
Practical Postulates
Price_€20 to €50
PS=Active
Pure Practical Reason
self-conceit
softlaunch
speculative reflection
Transcendental Aesthetic
Transcendental Logical
Twentieth Century Analytic Philosophy
Undeniable Truths
Vice Versa
Violate
Wittgenstein
Wood Sellers

Product details

  • ISBN 9780367695286
  • Weight: 590g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 26 Aug 2024
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

The chapters in this volume investigate the question of where, and in what sense, the bounds of intelligible thought, knowledge, and speech are to be drawn. Is there a way in which we are limited in what we think, know, and say? And if so, does this mean that we are constrained—that there is something beyond the ken of human intelligibility of which we fall short? Or is there another way to think about these limits of intelligibility—namely, as conditions of our meaning and knowing anything, beyond which there is no specifiable thing we cannot do?

These issues feature prominently in the writings of Kant and Wittgenstein who each engaged with them in unique and striking ways. Their thoughts on the matter remain provocative and stimulating, and accordingly, the contributions to this volume address the issues surrounding the limits of intelligibility both exegetically and systematically: they examine how they figure in Kant’s and Wittgenstein’s most significant works and put them in touch with contemporary debates that are shaped by their legacy. These debates concern, inter alia, logically and morally alien thought, the semantics and philosophy of negation, disjunctivism in philosophy of perception and ethics, paraconsistent approaches to contradiction, and the relation between art, literature, and philosophy. The book is divided into four parts: Part I gives a first assessment of the issues, Part II examines limits as they feature in Kant, Part III as they feature in Wittgenstein, and Part IV suggests some ways in which the questions might be reconsidered, drawing upon ideas in phenomenology, dialetheism, metamathematics, and the works of other influential authors.

Limits of Intelligibility provides insight into a theme that is central to the thought of two of the most important figures in modern philosophy, as well as to recent metaphysics, philosophy of language, philosophy of logic, epistemology, and ethics.

Jens Pier is a doctoral candidate in philosophy at the University of Leipzig, Germany. His current research focuses on metaphysics, the philosophy of self-consciousness, Kant, Wittgenstein, and the prospects for a critical philosophical methodology. In thinking about these issues, he puts special emphasis on how a proper articulation of the self-conscious structure of human mindedness might elucidate the relation between conceptions of philosophy aimed at systematicity and scientificity on the one hand, and those aimed at diagnosis, therapy, or explication on the other.