Locke’s Religious Epistemology and Its Critics

Regular price €192.20
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Nathan Rockwood
Alvin Plantinga
Author_Nathan Rockwood
Bayesian probability
Bayesian reasoning
Category=QDH
Category=QDTK
Category=QRAB
Category=QRM
conditional probability
contemporary religious epistemology debates
David Hume
epistemic authority
epistemic justification
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
evidence assessment
evidentialism
existence of God
graduate philosophy text
John Locke
Linda Zagzebski
Michael Bergmann
Nathan Rockwood
natural theology
phenomenal conservatism
philosophy of knowledge
rational belief formation
reformed epistemology
religious belief
religious epistemology
religious experience
Richard Swinburne
scripture
skeptical theism
steadfastness
testimony of miracles

Product details

  • ISBN 9781041063674
  • Weight: 560g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 20 Oct 2025
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This book offers a sustained defense of Locke’s religious epistemology. It puts Locke into conversation with leading figures in contemporary religious epistemology and shows that Locke’s views are more plausible than many philosophers of religion and epistemologists realize.

Locke has become the villain in contemporary religious epistemology. In recent years, Locke has often been singled out and criticized for insisting that religious belief requires evidence and for failing to provide adequate evidence that would support rational belief in God and Christianity. This book defends a broadly Lockean religious epistemology. The author argues that we need evidence for religion and that there is good evidence supporting belief in God and Christianity. He discusses Locke’s views on the evidence from natural theology, religious experience, the testimony of miracles, and scripture. In each chapter, the author contrasts Locke’s view on a type of evidence with one of his critics: Michael Bergmann, David Hume, Alvin Plantinga, Richard Swinburne, and Linda Zagzebski. At the end of each chapter, the author shows how a Bayesian analysis of evidence can support Locke’s evidence for religious belief, specifically a belief in Christianity. This defense of Locke’s position shows how his religious epistemology continues to be relevant in contemporary debates.

Locke’s Religious Epistemology and Its Critics is a historically informed contribution to religious epistemology. It will appeal to researchers and graduate students working in epistemology, philosophy of religion, and history of philosophy.

Nathan Rockwood, PhD, is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Brigham Young University, specializing in Locke’s religious epistemology. His publications include “Locke on Reason, Revelation, and Miracles” (The Lockean Mind), “Locke and Hume on Competing Miracles” (Religious Studies), and “The Authority of Scripture” (History of Philosophy Quarterly).

More from this author