Logic, Probability, and Presumptions in Legal Reasoning
Regular price
€248.00
14 days return policy
Shipping & Delivery
ACCEPTABILITY ACCEPTABILITY
advanced legal argumentation techniques
Analogical Argument
Analogical Reasoning
Ars Inveniendi
Attorney Client Privilege
Behavioral Message
Blue Buses
Category=A
common law methodology
eq_art-fashion-photography
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
evidentiary standards
Exemplary Argument
Factfinding Process
Hearsay Rules
Inclusive Disjunction
judicial decision analysis
LAW REVIEW
legal epistemology
Legal Reasoning
Logical Relation
NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA
NF NF
NG NG NG
PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW
Rational Force
REASONING REASONING
REVIEW REVIEW
semantic ambiguity law
Subjective Probabilities
Subsidiary Propositions
symbolic logic application
Product details
- ISBN 9780815326557
- Weight: 930g
- Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
- Publication Date: 01 Mar 1998
- Publisher: Taylor & Francis Inc
- Publication City/Country: US
- Product Form: Hardback
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
At least since plato and Aristotle, thinkers have pondered the relationship between philosophical arguments and the "sophistical" arguments offered by the Sophists -- who were the first professional lawyers. Judges wield substantial political power, and the justifications they offer for their decisions are a vital means by which citizens can assess the legitimacy of how that power is exercised. However, to evaluate judicial justifications requires close attention to the method of reasoning behind decisions. This new collection illuminates and explains the political and moral importance in justifying the exercise of judicial power.
