A01=Samuel Finer
accion
armed
Armed Forces
army
Author_Samuel Finer
authoritarian regimes
Bakr Sidqi
Balkan Countries
Bloodless Coup
Category=JP
Category=JPA
Chronic
civil-military power dynamics in government
civil-military relations
comparative politics
coup d'A(C)tat analysis
De Gaulle
democratica
Direct Military Rule
Distinctive Political Phenomenon
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Follow
forces
gaulle
general
General De Gaulle
General Neguib
General Uriburu
governance and armed forces
Insurrectionary Armies
Juntas
Juntas De Defensa
kapp
Kapp Putsch
military intervention theory
Military Juntas
Military Provenance
National Unity Committee
Party
Political Culture Level
Political Parties
putsch
Secretary Of State
spanish
Von Seeckt
Young Men
Product details
- ISBN 9781138536692
- Weight: 453g
- Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
- Publication Date: 14 Jul 2017
- Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
- Publication City/Country: GB
- Product Form: Hardback
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
The role of the military in a society raises a number of issues: How much separation should there be between a civil government and its army? Should the military be totally subordinate to the polity? Or should the armed forces be allowed autonomy in order to provide national security? Recently, the dangers of military dictatorships-as have existed in countries like Panama, Chile, and Argentina-have become evident. However, developing countries often lack the administrative ability and societal unity to keep the state functioning in an orderly and economically feasible manner without military intervention.Societies, of course, have dealt with the realities of these problems throughout their histories, and the action they have taken at any particular point in time has depended on numerous factors. In the "first world" of democratic countries, the civil-military relationship has been thoroughly integrated, and indeed by most modern standards this is seen as essential. However, several influential Western thinkers have developed theories arguing for the separation of the military from any political or social role. Samuel Huntington, emphasized that professionalism would presuppose that the military should intervene as little as possible in the political sphere. Samuel E. Finer, in contrast, emphasizes that a government can be efficient enough way to keep the civil-military relationship in check, ensuring that the need for intervention by the armed forces in society would be minimal. At the time of the book's original publication, perhaps as a consequence of a post-World War II Cold War atmosphere, this was by no means a universally accepted position. Some considered the military to be a legitimate threat to a free society. Today's post-Cold War environment is an appropriate time to reconsider Finer's classic argument.The Man on Horseback continues to be an important contribution to the study of the military's role in the realm of politics, and will be of interest to students of political science, government, and the military.
