"Man" Question in International Relations
Regular price
€132.99
14 days return policy
Shipping & Delivery
Bush Administration Discourse
Care Takers
Category=JBSF11
Category=JBSF2
Category=JPS
Civil Society
Civilian Strategists
Conservative Foreign Policy
critical security studies
Dough Boys
Emasculation
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Family Friend
Femininity
feminist international theory
Feminist IR
Gay
Gay Identity
Gender
Gender Inequality
gender politics
Gender Power
Geopolitical Bodies
Global Desirability
hegemonic masculinity
Heterosexual Soldiers
Homosexuality
Homosexuality in the Military
International Relations
International Relations Theory
Maculinity in the Gulf War
Mainstream IR Theory
male dominance
Male Hysteria
male identity analysis
Man Studies
Masculine Roles in International Relations
Masculinist Practices
Masculinity
masculinity in global power structures
Military Recruits
Military Sons
New World Order
Nineteenth Century Pathologizing
Orthodox IR
Politics
Positive Collaboration
postmodernist feminisms
queer military studies
Sex
Straight Soldiers
The Gulf War
U.S. Invasion of Panama
Undermine Unit Cohesion
Vietnam Syndrome
Vincent Van Gogh
War Ii
Women Studies
Young Men
Product details
- ISBN 9780367183639
- Weight: 453g
- Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
- Publication Date: 14 Feb 2019
- Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
- Publication City/Country: GB
- Product Form: Hardback
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
Originally published in 1998, The "Man" Question in International Relations looks the prevalence of man in the world of international relations. The book argues that, focusing on women as a way of changing the gender of international relations can position women as "the problem." The authors of this book suggest that the problem is not "woman" but "man." Rather than highlighting the absences and presence of women in the theories and practices of international relations, the authors concentrate on questioning the practices of masculinities, the hegemony of men, and the subject of "man." In this way, they hope to destabilize the field in ways that "adding women and stirring" has not.
