Manorial Capitalism, Enslavement, and the Logic of Dividuation

Regular price €56.99
Title
Quantity:
Will Deliver When Available
Will Deliver When Available
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Raphael Sassower
anthropological dividual
Author_Raphael Sassower
capitalist subjectivity analysis
Category=JBSL
Category=JHB
Category=JHM
Category=NHTQ
Category=NHTS
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
forthcoming
labor exploitation history
neoliberal theory
paternal authority
plantation economy
social alienation

Product details

  • ISBN 9781032998060
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 20 Jul 2026
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Manorial Capitalism, Enslavement, and the Logic of Dividuation proffers three perspectives on the plantation slave economy of the Antebellum South. The first explores the paternal function as exemplified in the structural authority of the lord of the manor both symbolically and operationally. This figure of masculine authority persisted from the Medieval period to orchestrate what is called here Manorial Capitalism. The second examines the exploitation and alienation that epitomize the logic of capitalism from the plantation economy to the present. And the third deploys retroactively the logic of dividuation to the plantation, a logic that draws its inspiration from neoliberal financial capitalism as well as from anthropological accounts (which distinguish the dividual from the Cartesian-Kantian individual). This book argues that reducing individuals to dividuated components continues to enable a dehumanizing capitalist mindset to fixate on abstracted labor power rather than seeing laboring individuals.

Raphael Sassower is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Colorado, Colorado Springs. He is the author of several books, most recently, The Specter of Hypocrisy (2020) and The Quest for Prosperity: Reframing Political Economy (2017).

More from this author