Marx and Mead

Regular price €173.60
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Tom Goff
academic sociology research
Author_Tom Goff
capacity
Categorical Element
Category=JHBA
critical
Critical Sociology
critical theory
Emergent Capacity
Empirical Impossibility
epistemology of science
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Evolutionary Assumption
fallacy
functional
Functional Moment
genetic
Genetic Fallacy
Historical Social Form
knowledge construction
Mannheim's Work
Marx's Work
mead's
Mead's Framework
Mead's Ideas
Mead's Perspective
Mead's Social Theory
Mead's View
Mead's Work
Mead's Writing
Mead’s Social Theory
moment
Over-socialized Conception
Oversocialized Conception
perspective
reflexive
Reflexive Capacity
Reflexive Intelligence
Reflexive Reconstruction
RLE
Selective Relationship
social behaviourism
sociological relativism
sociology
synthesis of Marx and Mead perspectives
Uncritical Importation

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138786172
  • Weight: 490g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 08 Aug 2014
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

It has often been suggested that a resolution of issues generated by the sociological study of ideas might be reached through a synthesis of specific insights to be found in the works of Karl Marx and George Herbert Mead. The present study originated in an investigation of this hypothesis, particularly as it bears on the central issue of sociological relativism.

The author began by delineating the specific problems such a synthesis might resolve, and in the process became aware that the nature and depth of differences separating the sociology of knowledge and its critics have never been fully analysed or understood. This volume therefore opens with a clarification of these differences, a clarification which leads to considerable redefinition of the problem as it has traditionally been understood by critics and proponents of the discipline alike. The author points out in particular that it is less a debate than a thorough-going contradiction which characterizes the literature dealing with the inadequacies of various formulations of the sociology of knowledge.

In consequence, the study of Marx and Mead presented here is not simply yet another effort to discover a perspective which will satisfy the particular demands of the critics. Rather, it argues that an adequate perspective fully consistent with the central insight of the discipline – that knowledge is radically social in character – is to be found in a synthesis of elements in the perspectives of Marx and Mead.

More from this author