Method and Imagination in Coleridge's Criticism
Regular price
€49.99
14 days return policy
Shipping & Delivery
19th Century Literature
A01=J.R. de J. Jackson
Author_J.R. de J. Jackson
Biographia Literaria
Category=DC
Category=DSA
Coleridge
Coleridge's Account
Coleridge's Analysis
Coleridge's Criticism
Coleridge's Decision
Coleridge's Discussion
Coleridge's Efforts
Coleridge's Essays
Coleridge's Interpretation
Coleridge's Lecture
Coleridge's Life
Coleridge's Treatment
Coleridge's Views
Coleridgean criticism methodology
Coleridge’s Account
Coleridge’s Analysis
Coleridge’s Criticism
Coleridge’s Discussion
Coleridge’s Interpretation
Coleridge’s Treatment
Conciones Ad Populum
Criticism
Encyclopaedia Metropolitana
eq_bestseller
eq_biography-true-stories
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_poetry
fancy and imagination distinction
Grand Problem
Hum Drum
Paradise Lost
poetic imagination
Poetry
Primary Imagination
romantic literary theory
Romanticism
Secondary Imagination
Shakespearean character analysis
Sir George Beaumont
Statesman's Manual
Statesman’s Manual
theatre audience psychology
Wild Ducks
Wordsworth poetry analysis
Product details
- ISBN 9781138670174
- Weight: 410g
- Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
- Publication Date: 28 Nov 2017
- Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
- Publication City/Country: GB
- Product Form: Paperback
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
First published in 1969, this book places Coleridge’s literary criticism against the background of his philosophical thinking, examining his theories about criticism and the nature of poetry. Particular attention is paid to the structure of Biographia Literaria, Coleridge’s distinction between Imagination and Fancy, his definitions of the poetic characters of Shakespeare and Wordsworth, his analysis of the mental state of audiences in theatres, and his interpretations of Paradise Lost, Hamlet and Aeschylus’ Prometheus. The emphasis throughout is on how Coleridge thought rather than what he thought and the process rather than the conclusions of his criticism.
