A01=Christopher M. Driscoll
A01=Monica R. Miller
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Author_Christopher M. Driscoll
Author_Monica R. Miller
automatic-update
Black Religion
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HBTB
Category=HRAB
Category=HRLM3
Category=HRLM7
Category=JBSL
Category=JBSR
Category=JFSL
Category=JFSL3
Category=JFSR
Category=NHTB
Category=QRAB
Category=QRVP3
Category=QRVP7
COP=United States
Critical Approaches
Critical Race and Whiteness
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
History of Religions
Human Sciences
Identity and Difference
Language_English
Methodology
PA=Available
Postcolonial Studies
Price_€20 to €50
PS=Active
Religionswissenschaft
Religious Studies
softlaunch
Theory and Method
Product details
- ISBN 9781498565646
- Weight: 395g
- Dimensions: 155 x 230mm
- Publication Date: 02 Jul 2020
- Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
- Publication City/Country: US
- Product Form: Paperback
- Language: English
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
Method as Identity: Manufacturing Distance in the Academic Study of Religion emphasizes the inexorable influence that social identities exert in shaping methodological choices within the academic study of religion, as witnessed in sui generis appeals to particularity and reliance on (or rejection of) identity-based standpoints. Can data speak back, and if so, would scholars have ears to listen? With a refreshing hip hop sensibility, Miller and Driscoll argue that what cultural theorist Jean-François Bayart refers to as a “battle for identity” forces a necessary confrontation with the (impact of) social identities (and, their histories) haunting our fields of study. These complex categorical specters make it nearly impossible to untether the categories of identity that we come to study from the identity of categories shaping our methodological lenses. Treating method as an identity-revealing technique of distance-making between the “proper” scholar and the less-than-scholarly advocate for religion, Miller and Driscoll examine a variety of discursive milieus of vagueness (consider for instance “essentialism,” “origins,” “authenticity”) at work in the contemporary discussion of “critical” methods that lack the necessary specificity for doing the heavy-lifting of analytically handling the asymmetrical dimensions of power part and parcel to social identification. Through interdisciplinary discussions that draw on thinkers including Charles H Long, Bruce Lincoln, Russell T. McCutcheon, Theodor Adorno, Jacques Derrida, C. Wright Mills, Laurel C. Schneider, William D. Hart, Tomoko Masuzawa, Anthony B. Pinn, bell hooks, Roderick Ferguson, John L. Jackson, Jasbir Puar, and Jean-François Bayart, among others, Method as Identity intentionally blurs the lines classifying “proper” scholarly approach and proper “objects” of study. With an intentional effort to challenge the de facto disciplinary segregation marking the field and study of religion today, Method as Identity will be of interest to scholars involved in discussions about theory and method for the study of religion, and especially researchers working at the intersections of identity, difference, and classification—and the politics thereof.
Monica R. Miller is associate professor of religion studies and Africana studies and director of women, gender, and sexuality studies at Lehigh University.
Christopher M. Driscoll is assistant professor of religion studies, American studies, and Africana studies at Lehigh University.
