Methodism and the Rise of Popular Literary Criticism

Regular price €192.20
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Brett McInelly
anti-Methodist discourse
Arminian Magazine
Author_Brett McInelly
Bishop's Arguments
Calm Address
Category=DSBD
Category=QRMB35
Critical Memoirs
devotional literature critique
early British print culture studies
Edmund Hall
Eighteenth Century Literary Culture
eighteenth-century religious movements
eq_bestseller
eq_biography-true-stories
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
Fog's Weekly Journal
Fog’s Weekly Journal
Gentleman's Magazine
Gospel Magazine
Habermas's Account
Holy Club
literary criticism
literary periodicals analysis
London Review
methodism
Methodist Leaders
Methodist Preacher
Methodist Revival
Minutes Controversy
Modern Public Sphere
periodical press history
public sphere theory
Review Journals
Reviewer's Point
Short Print Runs
Sir Richard Hill
Spiritual Quixote
Violated
Wesley
Wesley's Letter
Young Men

Product details

  • ISBN 9781032456867
  • Weight: 590g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 01 Jun 2023
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This book examines how Methodism and popular review criticism intersected with and informed each other in the eighteenth century. Methodism emerged at a time when the idea of a ‘public square’ was taking shape, a process facilitated by the periodical press. Perhaps more so than any previous religious movement, Methodism, and the publications associated with it, received greater scrutiny largely because of periodical literature and the emergence of popular review criticism. The book considers in particular how works addressing Methodism were discussed and critiqued in the era’s two leading literary periodicals – The Monthly Review and The Critical Review. Focusing on the period between 1749 and 1789, the study encompasses the formative years of popular review criticism and some of the more dramatic moments in the textual culture of early Methodism. The author illustrates some of the specific ways these review journals diverged in their critical approaches and sensibilities as well as their politics and religious opinions. The Monthly’s and the Critical’s responses to the Methodists’ own publishing efforts as well as the anti-Methodist critique are shown to be both multifaceted and complex. The book critically reflects on the pretended neutrality, reasonableness, and objectivity of reviewers, who at times found themselves negotiating between the desire to regulate literary tastes and the impulse to undermine the Methodist revival. It will be relevant to scholars of religion, history and literary studies with an interest in Methodism, print culture, and the eighteenth century.

Brett McInelly is a Professor in the English Department at Brigham Young University, USA. His publications include Textual Warfare and the Making of Methodism (2014).

More from this author